*Bob*

Basically she has evil eyes. Evil, sexy little eyes. So yes, I think she definitely must have done it. I think that's right anyway. Must be.

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- I honestly have no idea what went on that night I can't help feeling like someone has got away with(ish) with murder. "The prosecution rests"

Naturally we've sent ours back. But I still have to look at everybody else's. I can only hope they're not very UV-resistant.

I think it's worthy of a mini-moan. Perhaps not in the same league as the staving millions, repeal of the death penalty or poor wireless broadband range - but a moan nonetheless. In consideration of the requirements for a recycling bin, there are only really two relevant factors: 'is it the right size?', and (bearing in mind there's going to be one outside every house) 'what colour is it?'. What we seem to have ended-up with is a bin which is a) more than twice the size it needs to be and b) fashioned in a colour that no-one in their right mind would ever choose for their car, their clothes, their face or indeed their worst enemy. I think I've only ever seen that colour twice: on airline blankets - and Pat Butcher's face. To that end, the new bins are completely imbecilic and represent a certain crashing stupidity that often accompanies these mundane 'improvements' that councils make - when a better course of action could have been achieved for no extra cost - and would surely have occurred to anyone at some stage in the process - anyone, save a complete moron.

I guess I'm just a little disappointed in 'the future', as it stands.

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's a magic data cloud of limited range, hence > why your smart phone spends half its time > pestering you that wifi is available as you wander > down the street. If you had a thick brick wall which was, a few metres wide and high - and placed the router a few metres behind one side and the receiver a few behind the other, then the 'magic cloud' theory would surely mean that the reception would be similar with or without the brick wall? Only it isn't because the &&*^& things doesn't *&^*&^*& work.

But there's definitely a clear line of sight when it comes to sex.. with another person at any rate. I mean it's not like you can pass your penis through a brick wall and into a waiting vagina (try as I might).

Any wireless internet 'fans' here in the science room? Here's one that's been keeping me awake at night: is wireless at internet (at home) from a router to a receiving machine delivered 'in s straight line' from one to the other? Or does the router emit a sort-of magic data cloud which your machine can kind-of grab if it's nearby? Hope I'm putting this all the a proper science-like wording.

Clear Things Up. Cretins.

First the speed limit and now the bins. I've heard the government are going to announce a free lollipop and a back rub for everyone of polling age on Monday. Anyone would think there's a party conference around the corner.

Well our new blue bin is here and I have to say - I'm delighted. Loving the size (huge) and the colour is just brilliant!! It really livens-up the boring old 'tree' and other uninspiringly-coloured so-called 'plants' that we go to the trouble of maintaining. And the best thing is that because nearly every house will have one, I know I'm never going to be more than a few feet away from a massive, stupidly-coloured, butt-ugly plastic monstrosity designed and implemented by a selection of complete retards at Southwark Council.

I don't think you'd ever find a 'pure nine', but the closest I can get is probably Lou Reed's Street Hassle, because there are so many utterly abysmal efforts along the way. Not to mention some of the worst album covers ever (for a a major artist at any rate). Not that Street Hassle is a great album exactly, but the main ten-minute track of the same name makes everything worthwhile. You just have to make sure you get to the stop button before 'I Wanna Be Black' starts - and ruins everything again.

micheljonson Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi I am new to this forum i want to know each and > everything about this forum because i have heard a > lot about it. but i want to know exact details of > it. Hi Michel - perhaps I can help with some key facts. *The Forum was founded in 1803, by Casper Diddlecott and Barnaby Lemon, two Mormons from Penge - with the help of their fourteen wives. *During The Great War an entire online generation of young men were lost and - after much deliberation - it was decided that women would be allowed to join. But on 12th March 1919, the day of admission, twenty-six consecutive posts about menstruation and Grazia caused outrage amongst the established male readership - and they were forced to act. 'The Family Room' was duly opened on 13th March 1919. *There are only 500 registered users, and those on the waiting list must wait for someone to leave before they are allowed in. *The oldest poster is Sir Keith of Otta, who is 119. *The Forum is currently funded entirely by Foxtons estate agent, following a misunderstanding with the previous sponsor, Osbald Stennart. Hope this has all been of some help!!!!! !

Yes, GET OVER YOURSELF and SAY HELLO TO HARRY you bloody up yourselves London cycling sods.

Well 'the kids' are certainly mad forrit (the aftermath of any festival these days is knee-deep in clinking bottles) so I guess it will, sooner or later, be considered terribly, terribly dangerous - and thereby made illegal (ie 'slightly more expensive') at some point. And thus, Nitrous Oxide will join the ranks of the vast swathe of other activities which *could* (under - statistically - highly improbable circumstances) cause injury or death .. along with other evils such as 'fairground rides', 'light exercise', 'eating', 'going out', 'waking up' and 'breathing in'. I expect that if doing that thing - where you spin around whilst looking at the end of a broom held aloft and then try to run in a straight line - suddenly became popular with weekend revellers.. there'd be a ban on brooms.

I'm told they've been conducting trials on pregnant women during labour - before they decide on whether or not it might be safe for everybody else.

If you can do a lunch in the week sometime.. 3 courses and un bouteille will be about ?90 for two, including tip. Depends on whether you demand the full experience of getting bladdered and having to undo the top button of your trousers or not.

When the cold facts are laid before you like that.. well, what can you say? Totally blows my mind.

I never knew that about Pearl Harbour!! Wowzer - all this stuff really makes you think.

northlondoner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- But DC - sorry to appear unsophisticated here- but what's wrong with Adele. Usual story.. she has a good voice, broad appeal and sells a lot of records.

A 'waning star' for the other Big Four = 'potential hit show' for Five. Smart cookies over at Five.

Of Ireland? Yes.. Perhaps they could succeed where Dana failed.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What do you mean by "when Jedward fall"? They're > already on Big Brother. You've got to wonder what can be in store for them when the gravy train hits the buffers. I see hard drugs, sexual perversion and an early grave.

It's like a pact with the devil.. you get the good times, but sooner or later you have to pay the ferryman. And when Jedward fall, they're going to fall hard. And I can't wait to see it.

Even I can't stoop to another series of X Factor..