fishbiscuits Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You should not be surprised at people's reluctance > to endorse your obvious agenda here. If there's an agenda then what's wrong with it? If I've understood this correctly a man who wants to be considered a woman, and might well consider himself to be a woman, is being allowed to compete as a woman in a women's sport. Surely this gives him (yes, I said him) an unfair advantage over women who were born as women in that sport. Identifying as a woman is his choice but to oust the competition - by really being a man having not been born a woman, and then being able to compete with born-women - must be wrong. Like JohnL says there should simply be another category.
