intexasatthe moment

old police station site near Peckham Rye Station ????

That's outrageous . Have PM'd you .

Minder - is it actually stated that the overflow parking ia at the NDTC .I can only see the statement " tennis court area " . The NDTC doesn't have any parking as far as I know .

not the homepage ,the format of the emails .It's now difficult to tell/much less obvious which emails have been "read"/opened and there's this weird display in the sender display which refers now to the history of the email so it appears as " me ,me ..." I imagine I'll adapt ,it's more the not being able to control what I'm using .Another symptom of my advancing years ,sigh...

I have a @btinternet.com email address . The account has upgraded itself ( or someone in the household has given it permission to upgrade ) and I would love to go back to the previous version . I can return to basic but that seems to lack a lot of features that I use - spellcheck ,inserting links . I've looked online at suggestions but they vary a great deal and seem complicated .I'm nervous that if I embark down the route of changing screen resoloutions etc that I'll mess up and cause further problems . Anyone help me ?

I don't know the measurement but when the existing Charter school opened people living in the middle of Barry Rd failed to get in .It was a pretty small catchment area then and I rather suspect it will be the same for the new Charter .

Seems no change in the last twenty years Molly . And the accusing response of " was it labelled ? " that was delivered to any enquiry used to drive me mad . It never seemed to occur to the powers that be that labelling wouldn't magically prevent a child from forgetting to collect a jumper taken off in the playground . Me ?Bitter ?

Paul from Nunhead Ariels was very helpful to us and had some device which showed whether the fault was the signal or TV .Perhaps he could help ? 07983 306705

agree about a button being pressed inadvertently on remote control - easily done . You're a kind friend to help her .

Are you having trouble finding your post ? Click on your user name -in blue just below "Taking down an add " on this thread and all your posts will come up . Though is it this one http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9,1495022,1495022#msg-1495022 ? When you get to your add ,click edit at bottom of post where it says "options" and add the word sold in the title .Or you can just delete the body of the post if you prefer .

But if everyone added "I do not wish this to become a debate, this is just my opinion." at the end of their post and everyone else went along with it and thought " right ,no debate " it would be a strange forum wouldn't it ? " Forum = a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged." edited to say I wrote above thinking this was a thread in the General section . So guess I can understand that it's just a post for info to other parents .

I think 113 at the final consultation is quite a lot actually . Wasn't the right hand turn off the table by that stage and many people gave up at that stage having got a significant change to the original plans . It was quite a complex set of plans /options and did require quite a commitment to wade through . That nos may not seem much but in terms of responses to applications is quite high .

Yes Penguin I do realise that . I think it's a very poorly written and thought out document . Though I see more emphasis on exiting than entering in forward gear . It's conceivable that drivers reverse in isn't it ?

monkey - Southwark's guidelines on car parking on forecourts/front gardens says ", private land owners are required to enter into one or more legal agreements with the Borough Solicitor agreeing and undertaking to ...to exit (and in most instances) enter the Vehicle Crossing in forward gear " so cars shouldn't be reversing onto roads . Though don't ask me how that's enforceable .

Absolutely agree with Loz . I was amazed after someone had reversed into the side of my car to get a letter accusing me of dangerous driving and trying to claim for additional existing damage on a different part of the car . This was after I'd submitted drawn pictures .I just refuted their version and left my insurance company to argue with theirs and all was well . It does seem to be standard practice ,but pretty shocking .

St Dunstans ? http://www.stdunstans.org.uk/

James as usual you skirt round actually answering the questions asked .But never miss the opportunity to try and make political points . So depressing . You'll be glad to learn I'm washing my hands of directing questions to you .You carry on you're own sweet political point scoring way . Politicians !

James - back to my concern over double yellow lines 2 metres either side of dropped kerbs ,can you help mw with the following How did this policy come into being with no one seemingly aware of it ? My reading is that there should be consultation which at a very early stage involves Community Councils . Did this happen ? Given that DCC have already tried to have applications with this rule modified approved and failed ,what are the chances of it being reviewed ? And the time scale ? And how can we influence this process ? Thanks

Good news indeed . But as chazzle says ,further applications will made ,if not appeals . Keep up the good work chazzle and keep us posted .

Quite .What are the schools supporting ?

And actually it ( the patronising stuff ) rather implies " the children's voices must be heard " that their parents are deaf/non existent/not interested .

Have just reread qoute posted by hopskip . I was at DCC mtg and read this orginally then .Am I the only person stupid enough to be confused ( Haven't been following this quite as carefully as others ) but ....all the schools supporting " the scheme " . Which scheme ? Which proposal exactly ,there were several ? Although pointless question I know as Southwark have decided to go with an option not favoured by the residents .

Good and accurate accounts of the CC meeting . I wondered if the spokesperson for Safe Routes to School had spent much time practising her speech or whether the tone was habitual to her . Like mockingbird ,I couldn't work out who she was addressing . All parties have failed massively here ,ignoring people's wishes regarding preferred options , Calton Avenue not part of the modelling exercise ,the coaches will have to swing out cutting into oncoming traffic ,JAG's new building plans ignored . But no doubt the filter for " nervous " cyclists can be used as evidence of the safe and caring environment that the private schools provide for their priveleged pupils . Why can't measures be put in place so that the coaches use the the drive at the front of Alleyns to pick up and drop off ? ( as suggested at the mtg )

James - back to my concern over double yellow lines 2 metres either side of dropped kerbs ,can you help mw with the following How did this policy come into being with no one seemingly aware of it ? My reading is that there should be consultation which at a very early stage involves Community Councils . Did this happen ? Given that DCC have already tried to have applications with this rule modified approved and failed ,what are the chances of it being reviewed ? And the time scale ? And how can we influence this process ? Thanks

James what I don't understand is how this policy came about with out councillors ( or anyone else it seems ) being aware of it or having the opportunity to object or suggest modifications . Doesn't Southwark have decision making process about such traffic issues which involves community councils fairly early on in the process ? What's your view on this James ?