ianr

> as I understand it that part of the Act isn?t in force Whoops, I hadn't realised that. Thanks. Now you've reminded me of a fruitless hunt through the London Gazette a few months ago, for the publication of something like an old local TMO. The leaflet came through the letterbox this afternoon. OP's quotation is there, with a (spring 2022) appended to it, in a Next Steps section.

> They?re protected characteristics rather than groups I believe. Indeed. Part 2 of the Equality Act 2010. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/part/2 It's possible that the leaflet is also bearing in mind the "public sector duty regarding socio-economic inequalities" in Part 1 of the Act. Whatever, I do find its apparently mangled understanding or representation of the law rather depressing.

> I had a call from this surgery > today which showed up as spam. I suspect speaking to your telco/ISP is the best way of resolving this. Incidentally, the TJ GP askmygp portal is now saying "Due to high demands, this service is closed until 8am Monday the 14th of February. Any patient with an urgent presenting complaint,...". So, as one might have anticipated, the prospect of having a GP accessible by phone within an hour or so, as seemed to be offered, isn't so easily realisable. In one way it's reassuring, as it suggests that there's no offloading to an askmygp proprietary site. Note that this e-consult service seems to be different from the one used by Forest Hill Road, and from the EMIS system, on which I was previously registered when the practice was in Melbourne Grove. Registering online for this one is less intricate than for the EMIS system and was easily done online, though I've yet to see whether there are any more procedures to be gone through to enable access to personal data. I was able to access a self-help section, which seems, as far as I've seen so far, to act principally as just a portal to existing public sources.

JohnL wrote: > Because psychologically he was advised to do > this before (it was pre-planned not spur of > the moment) to associate in the minds of voters > Starmer and Savile - this is what analysts are > telling us and why Johnson won't apologise. Information sources please. I'd like to be able to judge the veracity, likeliness, etc of reports at first hand. My own, rebuttable, presumption about Johnson's refusal to apologise further has been that it was probably based on previous experience of the other side blaming him as a departmental head for the actions of subordinates. I guess that ploughing through PMQs etc might well find some examples.

Jenijenjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I submitted an econsult form to FHRGP, received a > phone call from them by the end of the day and had > an appointment at Tessa Jowell the next day Was it the Extended Primary Care Services, 0208 194 7570, at TJHC that you were referred to? They are located there, and appear to act as an ad hoc daytime backup service for a consortium of South Southwark GP practices. https://www.ihlsouthwark.co.uk/what-we-do/epcs/ (also mentioned by me at /forum/read.php?5,2254369,2254420#msg-2254891) I've no idea whether they (or, for that matter, the consortium Covid-19 vaccination sessions held at TJHC) share any facilities with the Tessa Jowell GP practice. Can anyone illuminate?

DMC Crystal Palace Road and The Lordship Lane Surgery These two were downrated for the general categories "Safe" and "Effective" and "Well-led". They were amber "Requires improvement" ratings, apart from DMC's red "Inadequate" flag for "Well-led". Some amber ratings too for both for some of their specific areas of work: People with long term conditions: "Requires improvement" Families, children and young people: "Requires improvement" Working age people (including those recently retired and students): "Requires improvement" Full details here: DMC Crystal Palace Road https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-565650623 The Lordship Lane Surgery https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-537675048 Index to SE22 and surrounds: https://www.cqc.org.uk/search/services/doctors-gps?location=London%20SE22&sort=default&la=&distance=2&mode=html ETA: I've not found any indication that the 'worst' list was actually collated and published by the CQC, and personally I doubt whether they'd think it proper for themselves to do so. It looks to me more like journalists' datascraping, as I guess was done too for the Ofsted ratings story.

Brideshead wrote: ---------------- > The amount of your money it bar slides > to day rate consultants who sit about on > social media most of the day, would make > your blood boil. Don't stop there. Tell us all you know.

203

Feel the width.

Cora wrote: ----------- > Do you know why the Tessa Jowell centre > never shows up on the NHS booking website. TJHC is a GP-led centre rather than one of the clinics set up by NHS central. A little more here: /forum/read.php?32,2241143,2247457#msg-2247457.

It was the ages of the perpetrators I was asking about.

How old are they?

Ofcom are nonetheless 'on the case', in their own manner."For example, in 2020 we fined Royal Mail ?1.5m for missing its 2018/19 delivery target. We are preparing to review Royal Mail?s performance for the current 2021/22 financial year and, if appropriate, we will not hesitate to take action where necessary." — https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2022/update-royal-mail-delivery-delays On that page there's also a downloadable report on their monitoring.

.

Good tidings of great joy. An Hebdomas Mirabilis. Three deliveries of PE this week: the most recent issue, just the usual week late; and today, both the Christmas issue and the one after that. Not lost, but resting.

I'm far from sure, after listening to lots of reports in the last two days, that there's even a common understanding of the meanings of "intervene".

Thanks theron, but I can't find anything at www.facebook.com/Baburrestaurant/ .

> That?s all I know! Your source(s)?

Nigello wrote: --------------- > A stand in postie pushed loads through > today. I chatted to them - come from a > town at least a hundred miles away ... > Offered to boss to do the same tomorrow > - paid for from time of getting > on train or bus, etc. to leaving said > transport mode back at home town. Thanks for that info. Do you know if they're an RM employee in their home town, or maybe a vetted regular temp agency worker, or ...?

The thieves presumably already have means of disposing of batches of stolen converters or their valued content. How will marking of the cases deter them?

More information on the system here: https://askmygp.uk/how-it-works/.

I suspect he's anticipating that her judgement as to possible breaches of law may differ substantially from some common beliefs.

"Rail replacement bus stop locations are shown in the 'Getting to and from the station' section under 'onward travel'" according to the 'Staffing and general services' section at https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/EDW/details.html. When you get to the 'onward travel' section there's just a link to a poster size PDF file of two maps. They include lots of bus stops, but I can't find anything indicating the two used for rail replacement. I know they are in East Dulwich Grove, reached via Melbourne Grove. I can't remember though, whether either or both of the stops are the TJHC stops or the ones nearer LL. So I gave up, and found the answer here: /forum/read.php?5,1035980,1036271

.

> The initial rollout was speedy but other > countries caught up and overtook UK pretty > quickly (with much higher vaccination rates > to boot) Is there any mileage in the hypothesis that vaccination uptake rates might be moderately independent of the identity of the ruling party?