ianr

RM is still subject to some statutory oversight and regulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_Services_Act_2011

Charlie Smith Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > City Airport has failed to engage residents and > local stakeholders and simply published the > consultation document in a buried section of their website. I've not found it yet. Is it still there? It took some time even to find those parts that dealt with engagement with "our community". The sign to follow seems to be CSR (Corporate Social responsibility). I then find a consultative committee http://www.lcacc.org/ that doesn't include Southwark or Lambeth residents or council among its members, and an Airport Transport Forum http://lcacc.org/atf/index.html which seems not to have met since 2013. I'm posting, btw, simply because of interest in the social engagement and consultation matter. I don't have an issue with the noise of their arrivals.

I've just noticed this from the London Wildlife Trust at http://www.wildlondon.org.uk/events/2015/11/13/londons-urban-wildlife-free-talk-peckham. London's urban wildlife - free talk in Peckham (Library) Fri, 05/02/2016 - 11:00am - 12:30pm

How were entries and exits measured for each of these years?

http://www.trustedit.co.uk/blog/telephone-scam/ Runners of Linux, etc systems have sometimes reported stringing the scammers along for ages before telling them that they are not actually using Windows.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) do perform and commission personal household surveys: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/get-involved/taking-part-in-a-survey/information-for-households/about-ons-households-and-individuals-surveys/index.html. I'd just be wary of people hijacking the 'National Statistics' term for some commercial survey or other purpose.

The two image files extracted from Zak's Railway Rise New Development.docx file, headed "Railway Rise ? Proposed Development Of No?s 2 & 3":

I was going also to second hazelnunhead's suggestion of trying a missed out repeat digit. But how about simple brute force, trying every missing digit in each acceptable position, using a bulk messaging sevice or software? No more than 90 candidates. I've generated a list of them that I can send you in any format if you pm me.

You can see the full allocations at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/numbering/. My first bet, assuming that many people remember their numbers in the allocated 5+6 form, would be that the initial 0788 is correct, and that it might be the last digit of the initial five, or the first of the final six. That gives you twenty to try. ie 0788? 314843 or 07883 ?14843

A previous case, with some advice: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1094009,page=1 MOPAC is Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime

It's Daneville Road the entrances are on. I had a look today. Despite the large signs saying Butterfly Walk Customers Car Park, all the contractual notices simply call it a 24/7 pay-and-display car park, ?1.50 for the first hour, whoever you are. Is there much enforcement of that? I didn't see any obvious cameras at the east entrance.

Otherwise it sounds as if it might have been a Lebanese loop, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanese_loop. Possible actions? Examine the card slot for the device? Call your bank immediately to cancel card? Hang around, openly or covertly, in the expectation that a perp will be along shortly to collect the card? Call the police immediately to advise them a possible Lebanon loop exploit is in mid-course?

If you provide just a link, you allow each reader the choice of downloading.

There's an ECJ preliminary ruling in a recent case that possibly impacts on the DPA exemption. The following is from the ICO's "code of practice for surveillance cameras" of 21/5/2015, https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1542/cctv-code-of-practice.pdf (357kB). "The use of surveillance systems for limited household purposes can be exempt from the DPA. "The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its judgment in the case of Ryne? on 11 December 2014. In this judgment, the CJEU concluded that where a fixed surveillance camera faces outwards from an individual?s private domestic property and it captures images of individuals beyond the boundaries of their property, particularly where it monitors a public space, the recording cannot be considered as being for a purely personal or household purpose. "This means that cameras attached to a private individual?s home may, in certain circumstances, no longer be exempt from the requirements of the DPA under section 36. Those circumstances are likely to include where the camera monitors any area beyond the interior and exterior limits of that individual?s home. This would include any camera to the extent that it covered, even partially, a public space such as the pavement or street. It would also cover cameras which captured areas such as neighbours? gardens. "This decision does not mean that using such a camera is not possible but it does mean that individuals will have to ensure that its use is legitimate under the DPA. The CJEU made clear that use of cameras to protect a property in this way can meet the legitimate interest condition in the legislation. The ICO has produced a short complementary piece of guidance for the public on how to ensure the use of a surveillance camera on a private domestic property complies with the DPA." What looks like the new guidance seems to be at https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/cctv/. Ryne?'s case arose as a result of his being fined for a DP breach after having taken his surveillance recording to the police to enable a prosecution http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/11/home-surveillance-cctv-images-may-breach-data-protection-rules-european-court-judgment-says. But what might happen here, if a DP breach was alleged in similar circumstances, I don't know.

I see that the only CCs whose minutes are publicly available online are the two whose next meeting is next week. Is there any reason why they all take so long to appear?

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Robert Poste's Child Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > eating mince pies and family tins of Quality > > Street for five months > > I'm trying to figure out what's bad about that... You don't have to just sit and gorge. Close the curtains and tune in to the True Christmas channel. Available 24/7.

.

JimiSayo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > War veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder > have been found to have significant hypothalamus > shrinkage, You mean hippocampus. See also this paper, on lower hippocampal volume as a vulnerablity factor for PTSD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819093/ > And yes, the good news is that hypnothalaums shrinkage can be reversed. > I'm certified as a practictioner of a psycho-sensory therapy called havening > which activates the delta state in the recipient and releases serotonins. Evidence please, given that you're within a hair's breadth of advertising.

rabbitears Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He was in hospital for six days after being arrested? > Blimey. Was he injured before, during or after arrest? If it's the same incident as this, the ES reported that a man was found unresponsive after a three hour standoff. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1593044 To know any more I think we now have to wait, now that it's sub judice, for any trial report.

I assume this follows on from http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1574548. The planning committee agenda, documents, and minutes (items 5.3 on) are at http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=119&MID=5203. Any of the Appendix 4 files (700 kB satellite images) seems to have both application main site locations marked in white. eg http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s56776/Appendix%204%20image.pdf

If you're lot nearer to the 37 bus route than to ED station and are able to reliably check bus arrival times, the 37 bus to CLJ could turn out to be a viable, if less predictable, alternative at that time of day.

I think not everyone realises that they can edit the subject line of a post. If that post is the one that starts a thread, the change will then appear in the list of thread titles.

> It is also nice to see the original SNUB bags, still being used in Dulwich, > makes me tingle all over.After 7 years, the bags still look great. Someone else thought so too. Mine was just right for keeping in my rucksack, to take any overflow from my supermarket shopping. But I left it at an Aldi[*] till one afternoon, and it had disappeared by the time I got back. If anyone has a spare one they no longer need, I'd be very glad of it. [*] Lidl is much pleasanter, imo, btw.