Seabag

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A video has found its way on to YouTube. I > despair. An event in a public space gets uploaded to You-Tube and you dispair. But you're alright with heating the event with your own spin in the first place. >Posted by rahrahrah April 30, 06:48AM >People watching and filming, but haven't talked to police. Ffs. The Police made an arrest within a relatively short space of time, but you can't of actually know if anyone had or hadn't spoken to the police when you posted the above.

Is it that time of the year already. The "Flying Ant" thread returns *blows plastic trumpet*

Great, we done here now? Next, where to get teeth done on the cheap. I hear Bulgaria or Hungary or somewhere like that

Wot's Chomsky's view on coveting thy neighbour's ox? Or wife for that matter.

I live by that road, and I'm not a speed freak, but 20 there feels so bloody painful. You get maniacs coming by you going at 29mph, waving fists and foaming at the mouth. Society is going to the nox-filled dogs I say.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > rendelharris Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Borky Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > I think I will depart now. > > > > > > It is quote shocking how uninspired the > > responses > > > are these days. > > > > "These days"? You've only been on here since > last September! > > > Probably a well-known multi-poster-reincarnate... Yeahhhhh, borky's back!

3rd world problems Sigh!

steveo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm intrigued Seabag. What is it, meth? No, but great thought.

Chief Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A pity that Tandoori Nights doesn't close. Living > on former glories: it's had its day. > Average food, expensive, lousy service. There are > now lots of better restaurants in Lordship Lane. Sadly a lot of this is true Deffo past its 'best'

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > First we get anthroporphism and now we have > binkyliliput clling the inanimate object 'a little > guy'- they will just get stolen when they are out > on their own-along with YOUR shopping- and a good > thing too Hopefully the one made in Poland will run you over.

I'm doing some colouring and sticking in my jotter

When Lordship Lane was actually Lord Shipping Lane, and Spanish Galleons played their trade up it.

Lordship 516 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > rahrahrah Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > So May is now accusing 'Brussels' of > interfering > > in the election. Incendiary, counterproductive > and > > far from being in the national interest. But > then > > the Tories seem happy to destroy relations with > > Europe in exchange of narrow party interests. > > I find the government line quite mad & mayopic. > For all their chat about planning & doing deals > and how europe will hurt more than the UK, Europe > has been working quietly to replace UK import > volumes with export to alternative markets - they > very obviously have a co-ordinated plan. Ireland > has just signed a deal with China for premium > pork, beef, crab & racehorse exports, signed a > deal for exporting premium grass-fed beef to the > USA etc; Germany has cleared the way for more car > exports to China - a moderate increase to China > will absorb all of their exports currently made to > the UK; Spain has been all over South America > recently doing deals & France is very active in > Africa. Eurpoe is already preparing substitute > markets for a hard Brexit while the Mayniacs are > arguing the toss about the square root of fcuk > all. I'm pretty sure that switched on companies > in the UK are doing likewise but the government > appears to be blinded by the glaring headlights of > their own making. > > For every marketing/sales person the UK can put on > the ground, the EU can send 9 or 10 - critical > mass is what matters & they will make more > headway, faster. I've started to set up shop in Copenhagen, by securing a distribution space from Sweden. We have customers there already. It's just as easy to fly to Denmark as it is to get to Manchester. We're off to Ruplic of Ireland in June to do the same, and I'm staring distribution in Paris in Jan 2018 with a U.K partner who's aquired warehousing on the outskirts. All but most of our produce will be from within the E.U I've also increased our purchasing from Spain, as we intend on bypassing our U.K set up completely in the future. And my business is small fry in the bigger picture. I see our U.K operation as being a shop window/Trojan horse for the bigger business we'll do outside of here. But I'm quite saddened by the reality of that.

titch juicy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It feels like it's a case of the EU acting with > some class and May acting like a spoilt child who > doesn't want to share with other children, but > starts crying when the other children take their > toys away. I don't like May, but I like this kind of analogy even less Leavers use this language regularly, I'm not sure whether you are one or not And actually, I don't give a toss

Murder in Successville

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seabag Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > In fact, I'm suspicious when politicians > express > > thier 'faith', it conveys a level of willful > > blindness, of which I'm not good at. > > Couldn't agree more. But credible alternatives > seem thin on the ground. I hear Tony Blair is to make a reappearance God sh!t, it is getting desperate Is Dirty Den still alive?

Keeping your beliefs out of politics? Doesn't exactly fill you with confidence does it. In fact, I'm suspicious when politicians express thier 'faith', it conveys a level of willful blindness, of which I'm not good at. So Fallon is a lamer duck than I'd like, and it's much the reason I dislike May and her leanings. And some of the biggest hypocrites I've come across have expressed thier 'faith' as some kind of badge of validation. Nah, not for me!

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's relevant to seek information on serious crime > if it's in your community. I agree with that. But my comments regarding mawkish behaviour was for others who as far as I know aren't residents in the vicinity. Specially when silly knee jerk comments are made or ones deliberately heating the facts for effect. I wish you well.

intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You're right Alice ,not really an occasion for nit > picking . Therein lies the rub, the description of crime as an 'occasion' like it's a visiting fun fair. It's a murder, not something to fish for information at for vicarious pleasure or make comments like "gosh, did I miss the memo" or "Not too stressed to film though.." And I'm not sure Alice's "We all seem to care so much" comment was meant to back anyone up. I suggest you go back to the beginning and read the Met's memo on the OP's link. There's nothing I see there that suggests people aren't assisting the Met in all the ways they can. But the following posts are revealing of knee jerk prejudice in such cases, with the assumption that 'people' aren't assisting the Met Rah-rah heated the info up to serve a purpose unknown, and from there it snowballed into Turtle's snide comment that was short hand for what I said above. However, as I said previously. It's mawkish in my view to seek info on incidents that don't really have anything to do with you, or at it's worst it's "virtue signalling" of which nobody likes to be called out for. And yes, harsh as it is, I stand by my comments. This news you seek isn't a form of arms length entertainment. Let the Police do thier job, and if your unsure as to what goes on, then sit back and keep you 'sympathies' in check, and maybe reflect on doing something useful with them.

This is Spam no?

turtle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seabag Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > intexasatthe moment Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > "And you've posted on two threads about > > > stabbing." > > > > > > gosh ,did I miss the memo about limiting > posts > > ? > > > > > > edited to add quotation marks . > > > > Sling your hook, I wasn't talking to you, so > butt > > out. FYI, it's not about limitions, it's about > the > > nature of the inquiry from Turtle. On one hand > > passing some slightly snide comment about > people > > filming, watching such events. Then hovering > round > > mawkishly offering some kind of 'sympathetic' > > enquiry about the event. > > > > Other than that, nose & ointment comes to mind. > > > The event I was enquiring about was a different > one to this, for your information. My comment on > here was not snide and my enquiry about the young > man stabbed in Dulwich Park was 100% genuine. At > least you have shown you self for what you are. > Stick your ointment! I'm absolutely fine with me, but you, I find mawkish. There's plenty to ogle at elsewhere on-line. If you need more info, google is vey informative here. But you seem to require more details, and passing silly comments on people at the scene.

intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "And you've posted on two threads about > stabbing." > > gosh ,did I miss the memo about limiting posts ? > > edited to add quotation marks . Sling your hook, I wasn't talking to you, so butt out. FYI, it's not about limitions, it's about the nature of the inquiry from Turtle. On one hand passing some slightly snide comment about people filming, watching such events. Then hovering round mawkishly offering some kind of 'sympathetic' enquiry about the event. Other than that, nose & ointment comes to mind.

turtle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes that is correct, I posted in the General > section, to offer concern for the young man > stabbed in Dulwich Park, is that ok? Mawkish.

turtle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > My point is that I find it strange people would > want to film a catastrophe unless they wanted to > help catch the perpetrators, it seems to happen a > lot. As you have kindly pointed out, my view or > anyone else's is irrelevant. It's the nature of people, it's happened throughout history, phones and filming are just an extension of that. And you've posted on two threads about stabbing.

turtle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not too stressed to film though....? Obviously not, what's your point tho? Filming and coming forward straight away are two different things. I'm not defending it, but one thing is that with some of that film, it will end up in the police hands. And whatever our 'opinion' on those filming, it will possibly be useful. I was there in Peckham that day, I saw the crowd as I came out from the Bussey building. I also saw many many people taking photo's on phones. What the fekk people want photo's of a crime scene for I don't know, but it happened when the boy round where I live here was stabbed to death in the street, and someone posted (later removed) a shot of the scene onto Facebook. I can't see why people would want to do that, but that only my personal view. The world's a raw and horrible place sometimes, and we don't always act our best selves. But I'm cautious to judge to eary on stuff like this. The best outcome is the police are assisted in their enquiries, and a strong evidence based case prosecutes the crime. What your opinion or anyone else's is, is irrelevant.