Grok

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Grok Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Otta Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > or indeed FGM, yes you can > > > expect people to behave in a way that the law > > in > > > the country they live in would expect > > > > Where are the convictions? > > > > > > > > > That's pretty different from expecting people > > to > > > just leave their culture behind and fit in > with > > > "our" ways. > > > > > Er, its related to Sharia law discussion above, > > and denial these things take place. > > > > Unless youre a complete idiot. > > Which you clearly are. *hic*

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > or indeed FGM, yes you can > expect people to behave in a way that the law in > the country they live in would expect Where are the convictions? > > > That's pretty different from expecting people to > just leave their culture behind and fit in with > "our" ways. > Er, its related to Sharia law discussion above, and denial these things take place. Unless youre a complete idiot.

Quite clearly the child in question has attended school at some stage, and I would hope that if any abuse is going on then signs of this would have been picked up and acted on appropriately. Allowing young children to get fat is abuse and not an occasional burger treat. I believe the OP did the right thing based on her subjective view of the incident. Subjecting children to war is abuse but how many wanted Syria bombed. Sorry off topic. No one in their right mind would condone child abuse but dismissing cultural differences on evidence of a subjevtive description is dangerous also.

I consider feeding junk food to kids is abuse. I also think that some kids need a slap around the legs on occasion to halt unacceptable behaviour. I also think that the OP take on what she saw is very subjective. I wonder if things wouldve gone this far had the father not been black African in appearance but white.

Amazing how people change their tune about 'culture', and following 'UK norms' over in the Hitting a kid thread in the main section compared to this thread. Can't have your cake and eat it too.

Maybe it was the drumming of 614 pairs of feet on the terrace, that would be 1228 individual drums, now that would carry. There are even more evening games planned for next season due to DHFC success. Enjoy.

Johnnies Cafe large screen tv constantly on inane music channel that no one watches. Put the TV on a news channel, volume off, subtitles on.

OP, break parking laws, pay the penalty. Simps,

Most of the ponding I see in the areas mentioned belong to the businesses they are outside of as they are within the curtilage of the business premise and therefore the responsibility of the business. These businesses are making money hand over foot and are health & safety duty bound to ensure safe entrance and exit to said premise. I would not want my council tax illegally spent on this. Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > James's remit does not extend as far as Bellenden > Road, though he may be able to point you in the > right direction. > The pavements along LL, opposite the cinema, are > forever ponding and ought to be repaired soon, > lest another person be injured.

Op, just Ask James! He is a councellor of southwark.

What you call social indifference stems from throwing all the 'crap' into run down housing estates etc be the crap white underclass, black, muslim, immigrant etc. Then estate mentality builds up, is accepted and flourishes. These then become no go areas for reasons outlined above. It is then too dangerous to do much of anything because nicking a kid for stealing a car then becomes a war with an entire street/estate/neighbourhood and all the bad publicity/resources/accusations etc Vs nicking a kid for stealing a car. The number and type of crimes then escalate and nothing is done by cops. Ergo no go! Where would be a good place to find and try to radicalise people? Oh I know how about a no go area with the type of people im looking for at the centre of it. Police wont come, community are scared/have got my back. Job done. Did you never see the news of stickers being placed on lampposts and other public furniture stating no homosexuals as sharia laws in this area, no dog walking etc and other such ludicrous stickers appearing in certain east london areas? No council or cops removing offending stickers straight away, but meetings and discussions and denials and arguements and softly softly before removal of stickers. Trump is too stupid to think of these things. He repeats what he is told. He is told more than you because he has money. Yes, i believe such areas exist. LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Grok-- what you are referring to (rightly or > wrongly) would be police / social indifference. > We can debate if that's true but its not at all > the same thing as suggesting the police can't go > there because its too dangerous due to Islamic > radicalisation to step foot in those > neighbourhoods. There is a big difference between > the two notions.

Haha hes/shes a Sceptic! maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LondonMix Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > That was about Trump not Grok! > > Yes. Yes I know. > > *sigh*

Your compatriot said it! No, I know that there are no go areas for police that allow all kinds of criminality to continue/grow and this includes predominantly muslim occupied areas where radicalisation can breed etc. Yes, they were lying. Shock horror. I do not read katie hopkins. Am surprised you dont wsnt to nuke em all. Maybe the powers that be dont give a stuff that the white underclass, the non white groups etc are preying on one another, huh? Maybe thats why there are no go areas because if theyre causing misery to their own they aint hurting us and they deserve it? How many prosecutions have resulted from FGM in the UK? Still happens every day though doesnt it? Why? Because its allowed to? Same principle. LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You believe there are places so radicalised by > terrorism in London the police won't go there? > And that when the Met police, the mayor and the PM > all said that isn't true after Trump's statement > they were all lying? And you believe that while > no one can name where these places are (including > Katie Hopkins when questioned) that they exist? > And the fact that there was a weed farm above > Threshers most people were unaware of proves that > no go areas exist even though no one can name > them? Is that the gist of what you are saying? > > > > > Grok Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > But that is my point. The police, govt etc do > know > > about these areas, behave differently > > within/towards these areas, and absolutely deny > > they exist. > > > > Otta Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > And if the police don't know about something, > > then > > > they're not going to be scared of it are they?

Should i post pics? Lol red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Grok Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > Lush you are in pubs day and night, i see you. > > Stalker alert...

No

But that is my point. The police, govt etc do know about these areas, behave differently within/towards these areas, and absolutely deny they exist. Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And if the police don't know about something, then > they're not going to be scared of it are they?

True. Point was because people did not know did not mean it did not exist. Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Bit of a difference between a weed farm and an > area that is so dangerous police fear to tread, so > I'd argue it wasn't your point at all.

Thank you, exactly my point. Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not everyone is a liberal middle class Grok. And > so what if a flat was being used as a "bush farm"? > Why would everyone know? If they did then it would > have been a shit operation.

No matter what area or estate I name you will all chorus "oh no its not...." solely because YOU don't know this. No go areas are not no go areas for the entire populus 24/7 ffs, use your noddle! Just because Mr or Mrs White Liberal Middle Age does not know something exists does not mean it does not exist. What have so called community wardens got to do with anything? They have not replaced police, they have zero legal powers. Lush you are in pubs day and night, i see you. Do you actually think a no go area is walled, fenced, has signs and guard dogs?!! The only people that know its a no go area are the cops, other blue light services, local council, most residents of said area etc. Did all of you very bright types know the flat above the offy on LL was being used as a bush farm? No. But you walked past it, stood outside it, ate and drank across the road from it, worked near it, live near it, and probably jogged for fun around it but you didnt know it was there even though under your nose. Anyway, Trump, maybe we should let the people he is maligning create the fuss and outrage rather than do it on their behalf. ...

Bellend road where this happened is in SE15 I think and so nothing to do with Barber. Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes I will tell James Barber. > > Yes feeling much better thanks! > > My partner says I need to wear a bin bag over my > head with eye and mouth holes cut out to avoid > scaring the locals :))

Sorry to hear about your accident, Sue, hope you feel better soon. Probably for another thread but how about the Council using monies for fireworks, xmas lights and other non essentials for essentials like fixing pavements.

To the OP, go ahead and complain. It is not about whether it is once, twice or 50 times a year, it is about if it is causing you a nuisance and that can be 1 or 100 times. If you feel intimidated, or unconfident or uncomfortable about talking to the people causing the problem then dont. Call the noise police, that is why they are there. In an ideal world you should be able to talk reasonably with people to resolve issues, but in an ideal world you wouldnt have to put up with their unreasonable behaviours because it wouldnt happen. If you feel able to talk with them, fine. If not, use the ofgicial route. Good luck.

Yes, I'm sure. This site is not representative of East Dulwich despite what its users may think, plus I suspect many patients have changed Docs precisely because of the slagging on here. That leaves less patients, more appointments and more time! Jollydee. Borderlands Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Are you sure - it's not the general view of > Melbourne Grove on this site.

I think they saw you coming, Foxy! Maybe in a premonition type way. . DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Unbelievable .. My Phone has now burst back to > life after 3-4 days... > > It would not charge (Beep) when I plugged in > charger. EE tried their charger but I assume they > did not > hold down button. I unplugged / plugged in the > USB cable to the mains plug and the phone started > to charge. > (Critically low Battery) > > But I have a new phone and SIM now so this one > useless to me now. > > Foxy

You have not missed anything. Have seen the first one and that was ok.