rendelharris

Good thought will pass on.

whypeter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > and I apologise for the vitriol of a knobhead as > rentboyharris Reported to Admin.

Quite right, I apologize for falling for the baiting of a troll.

whypeter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > still waiting on ''forfend'' Buy a dictionary. Or ask a grownup.

Nice. You're not really doing yourself any favours in terms of making yourself not look a poisonous spiteful sad little individual, you know.

Ignorant as well, top notch!

Ah, such sophisticated argument. Well done. Top grammar too.

For starters if he's at Denmark Hill station he isn't in Dulwich, he's in Camberwell, so that's your main point out the window. Secondly, I know a US veteran who lives in East Dulwich - he's happily married and settled, but if, heaven forfend, he developed mental health issues or in some other way found himself on the streets, why wouldn't he stay around here? I have no idea if this guy's genuine or not, but your cynicism reflects little credit on you.

It's going to be about how Brexit's going but nobody's sure what attitude she's going to show - some think she may use it to reassure Tory hardliners worried she's slipping, others suspect she's going to offer a conciliatory attitude to the EU. We shall see.

dbboy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Only three things bring me to > Peckham, the station, Morrison's as required, some > of the banks and Lidl. The rest of it, sorry but > no thanks. That's at least five things!

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > What is it like living next door to Peckham? > > OK, now I've got "Peckham? Peckham? Who the **** > is Peckham?" in my head... Glad it's not just me!

Selclene Southeast Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > All I am saying that the London Bus is as iconic > as the Union Jack, the Beefeater, the Crown and as > British as the Lion and the Unicorn. You wouldn't > adorn any of those with images of violence would > you? - NO. For many former colonial countries, all those images you mention (except maybe the Beefeaters) are intimately associated with violence, no adornment needed. There are even seventeenth/eighteenth century verses about the lion (England) and the unicorn (Scotland) beating each other up for supremacy!

Ooh, be careful - last time I suggested that I might care as much about children in Syria despite not being a parent I got well and truly hauled over the coals!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As I understand it, caged Birds (Hens) are used in > producing Eggs not as 'meat' Not at all, broiler chickens are frequently raised in cages, also there are dozens of UK "intensive" poultry farms where over a million birds (on each farm) are crammed into warehouses. Slaughtered battery hens are often sold for stock, soup and other processed applications, so even if you've gone out of your way to ensure your chicken was free range organic, are you as sure about your stock cube? Anyway, I don't eat eggs either.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > BUT. big BUT I do not get all High and Mighty > about only eating FREE Range produce when it is > clear we are ALL > being conned by the term Free Range and what it > actually. > > If we eat out, NONE of us can be sure what we are > eating. Not ALL of us Foxy, some us don't eat meat!

This chap's got a gun and there's a big explosion, is this poster promoting violence and does it send a bad message to the community?

If you can afford it, you love it, you're going to be there for a good time, go for it! We bought our second flat last year and adore it - don't regard it as an investment at all, it's just somewhere we love to live and can afford. Good luck!

rupert james Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As a resident of one of the roads off Camberwell > Grove I can confirm that traffic is heavier than > it has ever been. > > I am sure other roads off, Grove Park, Mcneil > Road, and Lydnhurst etc will confirm this. > > Rush hour brings jams frequently and arguments are > common. > > Depends I guess when you use the road, we > residents see the result all day of increased > traffic flows. > > Agree Camberwell Grove for cycling has never been > a problem. Yes of course the other roads will be experiencing heavier traffic, we were discussing Camberwell Grove itself, where in my experience the traffic is much lighter than it was before.

Sorry Charles that's nonsense, I ride up and down CG most days and the traffic has decreased massively, both up and down (from DKH to Camberwell and back) I usually get to ride in the middle of the road as I'm often the only vehicle in sight. I have no axe to grind as to whether the bridge should be reopened or not, but traffic has indisputably diminished since it was closed. I do agree it was safe for cycling before.

wulfhound Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The main problem with Quietways is that nobody is > clear who or what they're for. The marketing > material suggests leisure, but the actual designs > suggest much the same people as the present-day > cycle-to-work crowd. So it's not really clear if > they should prefer parks, or try to avoid them. It's interesting, I often use Quietway One, or part of it anyway, to run down to Greenwich. Just after The Den the route runs through Folkestone Gardens on a narrow (six foot) path, never any problem at all, walkers always courteous (as am I, I hope!). One would have thought with the former two-lane road running through Dulwich Park it wouldn't be too difficult to have a cycle route. However, when I first joined the EDF I suggested that the road in DP be divided, half for cyclists and half for walkers, and got about ten pages of vitriolic abuse, so perhaps I'd better keep quiet!

Haven't been in for many a year but the Commercial in Herne Hill used to be mobile free. Thoroughly to be encouraged, particularly to stop those who continue their conversation while giving their order - sure they'd soon complain if the bar staff were as rude!

Was no consideration ever given to running the Quietway through the park? When coming back from Crystal Palace with Mrs.H, who doesn't like heavy traffic, we go into the park through the College Road entrance, out through the Court Lane gate, up Dovercourt, down Woodwarde and so onto Calton that way. Wouldn't that have made more sense? Problems keeping the park open at night I suppose.

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > another nail in the coffin of our > national sport What have portable telephones to do with cricket?

Sorry Robin, don't know what it would do to traffic flow but having to get right, hug a roundabout to the right with traffic entering from the left (most drivers do not appear to think "give priority to traffic from the right" applies if it's only a bicycle) then immediately join another roundabout with the same again would definitely not be a good solution for cyclists. Personally I don't really find the junction as it stands much of a problem on a bike (though I am big, fast, confident and experienced), but that "solution" is a recipe for disaster for cyclists. ETA Looking at that model again, it appears only to address what would be best for traffic (i.e. motorized vehicle) flow with no consideration of cycle safety.

You're driving a car and complaining about the fumes. Brilliant.