Dogkennelhillbilly

I blame ironic middle class hipsters mocking Dulwich's traditional working class values by flooding the area and then demanding to be fed expansive sandwiches made from cheap supermarket bread. I've heard about their sickening Sunbeam parties and it's disgusting. They're flaunting their inverse snobbery and it's literally depriving us of our daily bread.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nevertheless, if I was a small retailer of e.g. > sandwiches with a regular need for bread I would > make an arrangement with a supplier (say the Coop) > for that supply Sounds like the cafes have already got an arrangement that's working out pretty well: "I'll pop in and buy bread if I need it". I suppose Edna's Cafe could negotiate a Just-In-Time baked goods contract with a distributor with KPIs and SLPs, but probably they've decided it's not worth their time.

I think the guys at The Plough (where I got mine a couple of weeks ago) were still doing it yesterday.

How much money was saved by this decision?

I thought they were required to have it there?

Every co-op card holder has a share in the business. Perhaps this is the clique of capitalists that runs the EDF forum she is talking about...

"the cafes buy them in bulk and don't seem to think oh yes I'll leave some for the none business customers. " Are the other shoppers considerate enough to think they'll leave some bread for the cafes?

ianr Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dogkennelhillbilly> Madhur Jaffrey and Annika Rice > (separately) at Dulwich Picture Gallery. > > What did you talk about? Talk to people? Are you mad???

Madhur Jaffrey and Annika Rice (separately) at Dulwich Picture Gallery.

Also, misogynists

robbin Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm relieved to hear that there was no attempted > abduction. I'm sure the police treated it > seriously enough to satisfy themselves it was not > a criminal matter. I'm sure it's not the sort of > thing they do (or should) take lightly. The police are completely underwater and underresourced. I don't think any such assumptions are safe, unfortunately.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >, there > are people who are purposefully not and the term > illegal does apply. The latter has a devastating > effect and you should not undermine because saying > so hurts some peoples feelings. What's this "devastating effect" of illegal immigrants that have no interest in legalising their status?

The fact that three days later > this doesn't appear to have surfaced in any local > or national press and the police haven't issued > any warnings would seem to indicate they don't > take it as a serious threat...this seems likely either to > have been a case of misapprehension...or crying wolf for some other > reason - it seems very odd that a nanny would > witness the attempted abduction of one her charges > and not call the police or even tell the parents > until they got home from work. This really takes the biscuit for speculation by small minded internet Poirots. You're assuming that you know what the real rate of child abduction is; how police and press respond to them; and that everyone else relates to police in the same way you do. There are about 2 non-parent abduction attempts every day in the U.K.; about 1% of kids will be the subject of an abuduction attempt; very few of them are reported in media. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37504781 Can we avoid forming an angry internet mob on absolutely sod all information? Chucking around allegations of "crying wolf" in this context is pretty unsavoury.

Does the Dulwich Estate have a role to play in this? The road from Crystal Palace past the tollgate and down through village and to North Dulwich station should be one of London's best and safest stretches of cycle route...

Sorry to hear all that.

That's encouraging!

monica Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Excuse me!!! I guess your not polite then, I am bi > lingual and would never speak Italian in front on > people who do not understand the language. So no I > am not talking rubbish. Eeejit You don't have a right to other people's conversations. What an overblown sense of entitlement you people have. If you don't speak the language I feel like speaking to someone that's not you, you don't get to hear it. This is one of the most linguistically diverse cities on earth. You're not going to get far huffing and puffing and insisting that other people only speak a language that you know when you're around.

monica Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >first its > rude to speak another language in front of someone > who does not speak the language Don't talk rubbish.

I think it's fair enough given the staff are > giving up their own Christmas lunches (that's > assuming the extra money goes to pay the staff, of > course). One of the joys of living in diverse London is that a Christmas lunch on 25 December isn't something that all staff will particularly care about.

...by taxing petrol and diesel cars more heavily, you mean?

I like Johnnies. I've never noticed the TV one way or the other.

Fly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So if > you have 3 cyclists in the house you can't do this > so still need a car. Cobblers.

Fly tippers aren't residents too cheap to pay ?16 - they're mostly dodgy shitheads who've been paid to take the rubbish away.

i heard the clown was taken into custardy