TE44 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes james I understand there is a problem with > fraud what i don't get is how a civil court can > make a ruling to > recover money, when no criminal charges were > brought. I would have thought the EFA woulld have > pressed for > charges rather than chasing money which was not > recovered. From what I hear, the spending was actually authorised, hence not actually fraud. If there was evidence of a criminal act, there would be charges.