ruffers

Are they black helicopters?

Not often you get a situation where no one wins, but this seems to be one.

stock

Here in fact

There's good and bad for just about any provider. We're on BT Broadband and getting an actual download of 16085Kbps as we speak, never had a gap in service. Telly through Sky and always been 100% unless it snowed on the dish.. You pays your money I guess.

plots

Tools.

A friend is recommending I spend 75 quid on seeing Dolly Parton... thoughts?

Blue Monday - New Order

How so?

And Hodgson for West Brom? I like him but seems like a mistake to me as it usually takes him a few games to settle in and they ain't got that luxury...

Life's too short. I always ask if they're happy to go to East Dulwich, if they're not the next one almost always is. I know the rules but I'd rather have a happy journey than a row.

Show Me Love - Robin S

Karen Brady's slightly weird letter from the future as West Ham host their first game at the Olympic stadium - http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/sunsport_columnists/3402516/Karren-Brady-reveals-her-vision-of-West-Hams-future-at-the-Olympic-Stadium.html - that running track must be behind someone's head.

Vision Thing - The Sisters Of Mercy

Errr, Enjoy Yourself - Guy Lombardo ;-)

Much as I sympathise with the victims here isn't this just scaremongering? Now I've read the post what should I do now?

cross You should never, ever, EVER cross the streams.

I've stayed in these kind of hotels and LM's right, there's no one around. Sounds like the local manager is trying to sort a deal for everyone's benefit - I'd be more comfortable if it was me though to arrange to meet and get some kind of receipt. 99% job's a good 'un though.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > for those of us not in the know.. what is the > preferred nomenclature? "Nomenclature" - a cracking word.

Although he could just be doing a Rooney and blackmailing the club for a few tens of thousands a week extra. It becomes an interesting one, taking Rooney as the example. "i'm off, the club's not showing the ambition".. "Here's a load of money".... "OK, I'll stay" Tevez - "I'm off" .. City "No, you're not (and presumably lots of other stuff)"... Tevez - errrr OK Torres "I'm off, no ambition" ...LFC.. "Err, we just signed Suarez" ... Torres .. "erm. Chelsea?"

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can't agree with that Ruffers. Play the ball to > Torres' feet and he'll score you a goal. If you > try and play fetch with him he's not as effective. > Under Hodgson's tactics he wasn't getting a decent > service. Look at how much further up the pitch > we've played in our last few games. There's the > difference. > I'd agree it's part of the difference but would argue the other part is down to effort. He just didn't look like he was even trying for Hodgson.

Enjoy the Silence - Depeche Mode

Sound Mirrors - Coldcut

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As I've just said to a mate. If FSG are serious > about taking Liverpool forward, then the team > should be built around Torres, Reina and Gerrard. > Not funded by them. > > EFF OFF CHELSEA! Even if one of the apparently doesn't want to be there? Lost a lot of respect for Torres in the last few weeks, it seemed like he thought he was too good to play for Hodgson but has decided to bother under Dalglish. Although as it turns out maybe he's just decided to attract some attention for a transfer. When all's said and done I'm sure he wants to play in the Champions League which seems at best unlikely with Liverpool for next season so no real surprise Chelsea suits with Drogba on the way downhill, it's the obvious destination ruling out United as they're United, City as they're a gamble and Arsenal as they won't spend money.