Brendan

Hermetic Order of the Golden Naga

Yeah but, by your own admission, Labour haven?t exactly delivered a ?fairer? society over the last 15 years. Why would they suddenly decide to do so now? EDIT: to make clear that this is in reply to LM 2 posts up.

My fireplace + my wingback + the brandy decanter + a Neil Gaiman comic.

Or half of the dastardly duo who killed the witch.

Big Trouble in Little China on telly last night.

What is a dongle please?

Oh well, perhaps the rainbow mural and the lingering smell of incense has brightened it up a bit.

Yeah I know what you meant. I was just having my own little rant.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am glad it is a property developer who has > bought it, rather than a family who wanted to live > there, Squatters or no squatters I can?t think of situation where it is ever preferable for a property to be sold to a private property developer/landlord profiteering off families need for housing while denying them access to their own homes.

How they get it to come out of the tomato sauce bottle so precisely is anyone?s guess.

You are only allowed to serve grilled goats cheese on a square plate aren?t you?

Jus? Rhymes with truss, no?

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Unfortunatley CC it seems that Clegg has forgotten > that people who voted for him and his party mostly > wanted a left of centre government and he is > probably going to give them a right of centre > government - exactly what they did not vote for. Although a Lab/Lib coalition wouldn?t really have been left of centre anyway. Many people will disagree with me but I think they are correct in going with the party with the most votes (such as democracy dictates) and if they get what they want out of the deal it will ultimately be worth it for everyone. We?ve got to remember that for this one very rare window we have a political party that doesn?t have ulterior motives in a position to actually influence policy. Whether they will be allowed to is doubtful but who knows. But you know, fuck it. Expediency is the issue not representation. What we need is a conservative dictatorship backed up by the military. That will get things done. Who are ?people? to have a say anyway? (Which seems to be the opinion of some of my tory colleagues this morning)

Some are of the opinion that the Labour party is only ?left? of centre by definition not practice.

No squares 'round chateau Brendan. Ours are hip to the plate.

One of them just shot my granny, ran off with my baby and caused severe soil erosion in South Australia. Signed: Disgusted of East Surrey.

They've not cut any deals yet have they? Anyway so 36% of the vote = 50% representation in parliament 29% = 40% and 23% = 8%. (all figures are approximate) I so want to live here right now.

Now why would you for a moment think that capability and a will to work to the public?s best interest would hold any sway over position and privilege within a tory government?

DirtyBox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 14.5 million people (who voted for the 3 main > parties... so the full figure is considerably > more) DO NOT WANT a Tory government! > > On that reasoning 16.5 million DO NOT WANT a > Labour government Possibly although I think it?s safe to assume that most Lib Dem voters would prefer a Labour government to a Tory one and that a significant number of Labour voters would have rather voted Lib Dem if they felt it would have counted. I don?t know if I can count myself amongst these though. Personally I can?t think which I?m more unhappy with, the idea of a party owned by big money concerns such as the Rothschilds where most of the supporters vote for it out of a sense of tradition engrained by a detestable class system or the idea of a party owned by outdated and irrelevant labour unions (but nevertheless the lap dog of large financial concerns) where most of the supporters vote for it out of a sense of tradition engrained by a detestable class system.

Read the title to this and thought it was another thread about which of the major parties is going to win the election.

I'd put it down to them being twats but I didn?t realise seats on bikes are a middle class thing. Is it because you need a degree in structural engineering to install one?

And that from the mouth of a Palaeologoi.

Oh don't worry, like nobody gets me man. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3112/3154670595_15bcf0da7b.jpg

Yeah, I'd recomend Westminster.

Well this is nice isn't it.