Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I imagine it moved because it's about the forum. It's still a fun discussion, but in the right place.


So far as I can tell, the moderators make their decisions on moderation with regards to the best interests of the forum. This rarely crosses paths with their personal convictions. The evidence is demonstrated in the forum's popularity and warm and loving environment.


They moderate because of a fairly socialist conviction that they enjoy the forum, and the contribution to its upkeep is both reasonable and beneficial.


Converseley they post with regard to their personal convictions and affiliations.


Moderators don't edit posts, and so far as I can tell exclusion or suspension is by consensus not unilateral prejudice.


All the evidence is that public knowledge of the identity of moderators exposes them to ill-founded personal attacks, persecution and a dismal reduction of the pleasure such a thriving community confers.


I sincerely doubt the ambition of those who seek moderators 'outed'. It reminds me of children who having pulled apart their favourite toy to see how it works discover they can't put it together again.


Really, honestly, drop it. The glee of your investigation won't mitigate the tears before bedtime.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10097-moderators/#findComment-299049
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...