Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My eldest is coming up to her 4th birthday. She's besotted by her dollies at the moment and has come across Baby Annabel in a catalogue that came with a doll she got at Christmas. (Correction, doll her little sister got but seldom gets to play with!!) I'm just wondering whether one of the real-life ones are really worth it? Okay, probably not worth as much as you pay but do the kids actually play with them differently than they would a simple one?


I remember a friend saying her daughter got given one that could wet it's nappy - but the nappies cost a bomb so she had to disuade her daughter from doing it (as even standard nappies could mount up in cost!). I'd probably do the same but it seems unfair to give her something but not want her to use it fully.


I'm generally of the 'less is more' frame of mind but open to be persuaded otherwise if they do really get more from them. And if so, are there any which are particularly good - or particularly awful? (I'm thinking as a parent who'll have to listen to it from the sidelines!)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10111-are-real-life-dolls-worth-it/
Share on other sites

You can get the baby Annabel without the wetting part. Ours crys and laughs etc and blinks and sucks dummy but, crucially, can be turned off. The nappies are expensive and I am of the opinion we do not need any more nappies to change in this house! ;-)

The soft body ones are better as they are more resilliant to changing, we had an unfortunate incident with a Baby born's arm whilst it was being changed....

Have a look at the woolworths website, I got a really good deal on this. Or Toys r us seem to have a huge selection also.

I'd be surprised if they could get more out of a 'real' doll than a normal baby doll. My daughters have the boring normal type, but as far as they are concerned their babies cry, laugh, eat, wet their nappies. I can't imagine it really happening could engage them anymore than their imaginations do at the moment.

We have both - My Sister got a 'real life' doll for my daughter via a Charity Shop. She plays with them all equally, the real life doll is quite heavy because of all the workings inside her body. Body is soft so dressing and undressing is easy.

I don't think they add that much value to the play, just a nice to have, if you can get on at a sensible price.


I did totally wind her up once by putting some peanut butter spread on some loo roll (to look like paper liner) inside one of her washable dolls nappies (Tots Bots do really cute pink cotton velcro fastening mini dolls nappies). She is to this day convinced her doll really did a poo, and can't understand why there haven't been any more since!


Tee Hee.


Molly

Her face must have been a picture, Molly!


I'm probably going to give in and get one, just for the variety I guess as she has other simple ones. As you say though Gubodge, the simple ones do it all anyway in her mind. (She's not long started all the imaginary play with them and I still find it so entertaining to stand out of sight and watch her!)


Next question though is....when do they finally learn to dress dolls by themselves??? I'm driven mad by, now both of mine, stripping every doll they get their hands on within seconds and then handing it to me to dress again. I'm sure the older one could do it if she tried but maybe I'm expecting too much and should just enjoy the fact that she wants to involve me while it lasts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...