Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha, Hal, you looked it up?


Yes, but it didn't do much good - I misread the time stamps of all those bids - fifteen, no less. I've just had another look.


The winning bid was placed at 22-Feb-10 20:38:28 - just before the other bid was cancelled at 22-Feb-10 22:00:16 but someone else had already bid ?35 on 20-Feb-10 05:00:00! What on earth was s/he thinking?


As you say, no cigar - but something definitely spooky going on - the mystery deepens.


BTW, the search for 'body lotion' found 13,117 items currently listed on eBay - mind-boggling!

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i wonder how hal saw it on ebay tho.


Nothing sinister or particularly clever - the OP contains enough details to enable anyone with an eBay account and familiarity with eBay's powerful search engine to find it easily.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > i wonder how hal saw it on ebay tho.

>

> Nothing sinister - Holy Mary that Hal's quite sinister.

or particularly clever - Mother of God he's terrible clever.

the OP

> contains enough details to enable anyone with an

> eBay account and familiarity with eBay's powerful

> search engine to find it easily.

Jesus, he has familiarity wit' a search engine, 'tis the work of the divil, he's doin' the divil's work I tell you.

Recently a 'green' shopping bag from Sainsbugs was sold on ebay for 1500 quid as they had sold out and no more production was likely.

You Rosie are a tenner up on the deal that's business, and some especially me would argue good business.


If you expect to lose money on all transactions I would say stop any further transactions.


Not everyone shops at lidl they also go to waitrose tescos and sainsbugs all of whom are more expensive on most items.


You have made a tenner and now you can't live with yourself, it is only that you are not used to being on the winning side and if you did this regularly you would get used to being up on the deal.


Some years ago I bought and sold antiques and watched some of the traders buy furniture at a price they could not recover when the article was placed in their shop, but they did this to take the floor and be the centre of attraction during the bidding for some strange reason they got their fix during this process a kind of showing off and being the 'star man'.


If you buy a bottle of something with your proceeds I am sure it will taste every bit as good as another bought with your hard earned. All I can say is you won one, many happy returns now live with your success.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Recently a 'green' shopping bag from Sainsbugs was

> sold on ebay for 1500 quid as they had sold out

> and no more production was likely.


SteveT, I have not seen the auction you speak of, but, and I mean this in the pleasantest possible way, if you're asking me to believe that a Sainsbury shopping bag sold for one and a half grand, then you're asking me to believe the most gigantic arse bollocks nonsense since Miss McGuire told me my thumbs would

loosen if I carried on winking.

She was wrong, I've winked all my life and my opposable thumbs are intact and functioning.


But surely SteveT, that was just a flight of fancy on your part?



Edited, to correct the spelling of the word 'would' and not the word 'wink'. I mean, go figure.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No dilemma here for me. They bid what they were

> happy to pay for the product, job done.

> If I bought the same thing from Tesco and they

> found it it was cheaper in Boots I wouldn't be

> expecting them to be chasing me down to refund me.


xxxxxxx


I agree with this.


I also think, if it's keeping you awake at night, send them back whatever you think is fair (though I'm sure they'll be absolutely gobsmacked as they probably don't even realise they could have got it cheaper), and next time sell on eBay at a "Buy It Now" price if you're not happy to benefit from an auction.

We were on holiday in France some years ago and went into a local bank to change pounds into francs whereby they gave us ?2,000 worth of francs back for the ?200 we had given them. I bought my wife a watch with the extra cash we had.

I bought a flat in 1988 in a good area and lived there for 8 years upon which i sold it for ?20,000 less than I paid for it.


Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, if you happily accept the losses you should also accept the gains.

Keep the tenner and by your loved one something nice with it.

I had a similar moment once. I sold a Marshall 4x12 for as much as it was worth new. I felt especially bad when I dropped it off, and found out the buyer was a teenage kid, and I'd just taken several months of paper-round money off him.


I momentarily thought about giving him some cash back, but instead chose to offer some important advice in the ways of rock. Far more valuable, and I left with a clear conscience.

benjaminty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is good news for you Reggie... have you

> relisted your err urmmm "track"?


Yes it's relisted..only costs ?1.20 to list a track for ?1,000,000...bargain.

Still keeping Michael Jackson's pillow off the number one spot

The whole of the world is run on profit and many people on this forum and the general public are embarassed at making it.


It's as if profit is a dirty word,

well I love profit,

and although we are never gonna make what the bent bankers (1.4 billion in bonus's radio4 this am)

and thieving politicians have made in recent times I still see advantages in the 'greed' system, over the alternatives.


Giving cash back when the price is agreed and money has changed hands is called 'luck money' and is quite commonplace when buying livestock at the cattle markets.


One pays for experience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...