Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A number of years back a large group of us went to the Backyard, or whatever it's called now.


To cut a long story short - because of the 'disinterested' behaviour of a couple of members of the group (not me.. I listened politely like a good boy) the house lights were turned-on and we (the whole group) were expelled en masse.


A year or so later, someone I was doing some work for said she'd been chucked-out of Backyard with a group she was with.


And then, over the weekend, someone phoned BBC London - again, thrown-out of Backyard.



Anyone else had a similar experience?

I know someone who got thrown out quite a few years back, in a way they deserved it.


This was early 1990s


LH - "I mean is anyone in this room actually going to vote Tory?"


Big, non-pc aquaintance: "I am"


LH: "Why the f*ck are you doing that?"


Big, non-pc aquaintance: "Because there isn't a BNP candidate in my constituency"


To be fair I don't *think* this was the real reason but he was just bored with LH's political ranting

No but me and a mate were out drinking in the west end, in the late 90's.


Lee Hurst was also in the bar, and my mate, being an annoying student approached him and the following exchange took place:


Mate (hand outstretched): Hello, Lee Hurst?


Lee Hurst: Yes. Hello.


They shake hands


Mate: I'm a big fan of yours and wonder if I give you a fiver would you buy me a beer so I can tell all my mates that Lee Hurst bought me a beer?


LH: No. Have a nice evening.


Make what you will of that.

I can appreciate that most comedians would prefer to be able to ply their trade without some tiresome knob (who thinks he ought to be the one on stage) grunting and screeching from seven rows back every two minutes.


But on the other hand, comedians (and comedy venues) usually tend to attract the type of audience they (largely) deserve - so shouldn't the person on stage be able (within reason) to handle that audience - assuming they're any good?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can appreciate that most comedians would prefer

> to be able to ply their trade without some

> tiresome knob (who thinks he ought to be the one

> on stage) grunting and screeching from seven rows

> back every two minutes.

>

> But on the other hand, comedians (and comedy

> venues) usually tend to attract the type of

> audience they (largely) deserve - so shouldn't the

> person on stage be able (within reason) to handle

> that audience - assuming they're any good?


YOUR MUM!


So, if Thatcher and Nick Griffin had a kid, would Richard Littlejohn be the godfather?

Or Kelvin McKenzie?

Or the Hitchens brother who tips up on any and every talk/discussion show, looking and (I imagine) sounding like a defensive, frightened and aggresive vole?

Or Melanie Phillips?

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> So, if Thatcher and Nick Griffin had a kid, would

> Richard Littlejohn be the godfather?

> Or Kelvin McKenzie?


Oh crumbs, I'm going to have nightmares thinking about the neo-nazi lovechild ( should that be hate child?!? )


http://www.stomptokyo.com/otf/Dead-Alive/Dead-babylaugh.JPG


I'm definately sleeping with the lights on tonight.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pines for the magical days of the Tunnel Club

> Greenwich.

> You really had to be sharp. The audience were the

> stars.

> Well apart from those on the stage.

> Bring back the Swede.


Aaah, but what of Chris The Piss, a man who decided that clutching a lit firework in his arse cheeks would amuse an audience.

An audience largely comprised of driters, stumblers, drunks and football fans.

He was right, it amused us to the point of choking on our beer.

We will not see his like again.

And that's fine.

I vaguely remember a story of someone literally dying at a Lee Hurst gig once.


Choked to death due to laughing so much.


I can't find any reference to it online though.....


....and it would imply someone finding Lee Hurst funny which is quite unlikely.

It was all thoroughly mediocre, in that tired-Jongleurs-circuit-filler way. In my opinion, of course.


But that's beside the point.


I've been to all sorts of comedy venues, from Dodgy old dives with sticky carpets and plastic pint pots through to all-seated affairs in posh theatres with a tub of strawberry Haagen-Daz.


At most of them them, to varying degrees, there were 'crowd control' issues (although the Jerry Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved, I remember) but they were always dealt with by a combination of the person on stage and the crowd themselves - not by men dressed in black with earpieces and walkie-talkies asking you to leave.

I went to Jongleurs in Clapham many years ago and a fellow on the next table was asked to leave for heckling. Shame really, as he was really funny and the bloke on stage was severely dying on his a***. Some sort of comedy-magic act. Minus the comedy. And the magic was crap, too.

ah Jah, but if the heckler in question, despite being wittily reposted, doesnt shut the **** up, as some who love the sound of their own drunken/insane/narcissistic voices won't, there comes a point where they are disrupting the evening to the detriment of everyone else.

After all the audience has paid money to see/hear the people on the bill, not the lonely alchoholic in the front row.

I would say if a heckler can't handle being put down, he shouldnt be in the audience.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

the Jerry

> Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved,

> I remember


xxxxxxx


Probably too stunned to speak.


I saw him in Exeter in the eighties.


Was uncharacteristically silenced.


Especially when he brought a friend on stage to demonstrate his (friend's) unfeasibly large balls.


:))

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went to Jongleurs in Clapham many years ago and

> a fellow on the next table was asked to leave for

> heckling. Shame really, as he was really funny

> and the bloke on stage was severely dying on his

> a***. Some sort of comedy-magic act. Minus the

> comedy. And the magic was crap, too.


If this was early 1984, then it could well have been me. I lived in the area and me and my butties would always complete a Friday evening's carousing with a couple of bottles at Jongleurs.

I was asked to leave on several occasions, for this and that, mostly unfunny hecklage. There was one memorable time when I was besting the featured comic and was escorted from the premises, and this sounds as if it could be that time.

Happy days. Wait, have you seen my Fonz, impression..? No really..wait...

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> At most of them them, to varying degrees, there

> were 'crowd control' issues (although the Jerry

> Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved,

> I remember) but they were always dealt with by a

> combination of the person on stage and the crowd

> themselves - not by men dressed in black with

> earpieces and walkie-talkies asking you to leave.


I *think* it may have been LH who jumped off the stage in a fit of anger to snatch a mobile phone from a member of the audience. He then proceeded to rant on stage that he despised people filming him on to post on You-Tube (td)

That was him.. he was up before the magistrate and received a small fine. He was concerned about having his material stolen by wicked television-scripting joke thieves, or having his material blabbed on the www, thus ruining the joke.


It's actually quite an interesting debate (which I hadn't really thought much about much) - if you're interested in comedy. Good piece by David Schneider on the subject here (which I won't plagiarise).


Stewart Lee also confiscated someone's mobile phone after it persistently rang during his gig.

He threw it half-heartedly on the floor and it happened to smash. When the punter got angry and demanded cash for a new phone, he said "I'm not paying for that - it's broken".

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Stewart Lee also confiscated someone's mobile

> phone after it persistently rang during his gig.

> He threw it half-heartedly on the floor and it

> happened to smash. When the punter got angry and

> demanded cash for a new phone, he said "I'm not

> paying for that - it's broken".


'Confiscated' threw 'half-heartedly' 'happened to smash', could Stewart have been any more camp?

And as for the punchline it's straight up Piggly out of 'Jakers'. It is, so it is.

Dopey hoor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...