Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A number of years back a large group of us went to the Backyard, or whatever it's called now.


To cut a long story short - because of the 'disinterested' behaviour of a couple of members of the group (not me.. I listened politely like a good boy) the house lights were turned-on and we (the whole group) were expelled en masse.


A year or so later, someone I was doing some work for said she'd been chucked-out of Backyard with a group she was with.


And then, over the weekend, someone phoned BBC London - again, thrown-out of Backyard.



Anyone else had a similar experience?

I know someone who got thrown out quite a few years back, in a way they deserved it.


This was early 1990s


LH - "I mean is anyone in this room actually going to vote Tory?"


Big, non-pc aquaintance: "I am"


LH: "Why the f*ck are you doing that?"


Big, non-pc aquaintance: "Because there isn't a BNP candidate in my constituency"


To be fair I don't *think* this was the real reason but he was just bored with LH's political ranting

No but me and a mate were out drinking in the west end, in the late 90's.


Lee Hurst was also in the bar, and my mate, being an annoying student approached him and the following exchange took place:


Mate (hand outstretched): Hello, Lee Hurst?


Lee Hurst: Yes. Hello.


They shake hands


Mate: I'm a big fan of yours and wonder if I give you a fiver would you buy me a beer so I can tell all my mates that Lee Hurst bought me a beer?


LH: No. Have a nice evening.


Make what you will of that.

I can appreciate that most comedians would prefer to be able to ply their trade without some tiresome knob (who thinks he ought to be the one on stage) grunting and screeching from seven rows back every two minutes.


But on the other hand, comedians (and comedy venues) usually tend to attract the type of audience they (largely) deserve - so shouldn't the person on stage be able (within reason) to handle that audience - assuming they're any good?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can appreciate that most comedians would prefer

> to be able to ply their trade without some

> tiresome knob (who thinks he ought to be the one

> on stage) grunting and screeching from seven rows

> back every two minutes.

>

> But on the other hand, comedians (and comedy

> venues) usually tend to attract the type of

> audience they (largely) deserve - so shouldn't the

> person on stage be able (within reason) to handle

> that audience - assuming they're any good?


YOUR MUM!


So, if Thatcher and Nick Griffin had a kid, would Richard Littlejohn be the godfather?

Or Kelvin McKenzie?

Or the Hitchens brother who tips up on any and every talk/discussion show, looking and (I imagine) sounding like a defensive, frightened and aggresive vole?

Or Melanie Phillips?

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> So, if Thatcher and Nick Griffin had a kid, would

> Richard Littlejohn be the godfather?

> Or Kelvin McKenzie?


Oh crumbs, I'm going to have nightmares thinking about the neo-nazi lovechild ( should that be hate child?!? )


http://www.stomptokyo.com/otf/Dead-Alive/Dead-babylaugh.JPG


I'm definately sleeping with the lights on tonight.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pines for the magical days of the Tunnel Club

> Greenwich.

> You really had to be sharp. The audience were the

> stars.

> Well apart from those on the stage.

> Bring back the Swede.


Aaah, but what of Chris The Piss, a man who decided that clutching a lit firework in his arse cheeks would amuse an audience.

An audience largely comprised of driters, stumblers, drunks and football fans.

He was right, it amused us to the point of choking on our beer.

We will not see his like again.

And that's fine.

I vaguely remember a story of someone literally dying at a Lee Hurst gig once.


Choked to death due to laughing so much.


I can't find any reference to it online though.....


....and it would imply someone finding Lee Hurst funny which is quite unlikely.

It was all thoroughly mediocre, in that tired-Jongleurs-circuit-filler way. In my opinion, of course.


But that's beside the point.


I've been to all sorts of comedy venues, from Dodgy old dives with sticky carpets and plastic pint pots through to all-seated affairs in posh theatres with a tub of strawberry Haagen-Daz.


At most of them them, to varying degrees, there were 'crowd control' issues (although the Jerry Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved, I remember) but they were always dealt with by a combination of the person on stage and the crowd themselves - not by men dressed in black with earpieces and walkie-talkies asking you to leave.

I went to Jongleurs in Clapham many years ago and a fellow on the next table was asked to leave for heckling. Shame really, as he was really funny and the bloke on stage was severely dying on his a***. Some sort of comedy-magic act. Minus the comedy. And the magic was crap, too.

ah Jah, but if the heckler in question, despite being wittily reposted, doesnt shut the **** up, as some who love the sound of their own drunken/insane/narcissistic voices won't, there comes a point where they are disrupting the evening to the detriment of everyone else.

After all the audience has paid money to see/hear the people on the bill, not the lonely alchoholic in the front row.

I would say if a heckler can't handle being put down, he shouldnt be in the audience.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

the Jerry

> Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved,

> I remember


xxxxxxx


Probably too stunned to speak.


I saw him in Exeter in the eighties.


Was uncharacteristically silenced.


Especially when he brought a friend on stage to demonstrate his (friend's) unfeasibly large balls.


:))

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I went to Jongleurs in Clapham many years ago and

> a fellow on the next table was asked to leave for

> heckling. Shame really, as he was really funny

> and the bloke on stage was severely dying on his

> a***. Some sort of comedy-magic act. Minus the

> comedy. And the magic was crap, too.


If this was early 1984, then it could well have been me. I lived in the area and me and my butties would always complete a Friday evening's carousing with a couple of bottles at Jongleurs.

I was asked to leave on several occasions, for this and that, mostly unfunny hecklage. There was one memorable time when I was besting the featured comic and was escorted from the premises, and this sounds as if it could be that time.

Happy days. Wait, have you seen my Fonz, impression..? No really..wait...

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> At most of them them, to varying degrees, there

> were 'crowd control' issues (although the Jerry

> Sadowitz audience were particularly well-behaved,

> I remember) but they were always dealt with by a

> combination of the person on stage and the crowd

> themselves - not by men dressed in black with

> earpieces and walkie-talkies asking you to leave.


I *think* it may have been LH who jumped off the stage in a fit of anger to snatch a mobile phone from a member of the audience. He then proceeded to rant on stage that he despised people filming him on to post on You-Tube (td)

That was him.. he was up before the magistrate and received a small fine. He was concerned about having his material stolen by wicked television-scripting joke thieves, or having his material blabbed on the www, thus ruining the joke.


It's actually quite an interesting debate (which I hadn't really thought much about much) - if you're interested in comedy. Good piece by David Schneider on the subject here (which I won't plagiarise).


Stewart Lee also confiscated someone's mobile phone after it persistently rang during his gig.

He threw it half-heartedly on the floor and it happened to smash. When the punter got angry and demanded cash for a new phone, he said "I'm not paying for that - it's broken".

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Stewart Lee also confiscated someone's mobile

> phone after it persistently rang during his gig.

> He threw it half-heartedly on the floor and it

> happened to smash. When the punter got angry and

> demanded cash for a new phone, he said "I'm not

> paying for that - it's broken".


'Confiscated' threw 'half-heartedly' 'happened to smash', could Stewart have been any more camp?

And as for the punchline it's straight up Piggly out of 'Jakers'. It is, so it is.

Dopey hoor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...