Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On a date yet to be announced, Dulwich will play host to a brand new Tour de Dulwich.


This road ramble will require participants to take part on an unmotorised 2-wheel vehicle of any size or shape.


The route of the Tour de Dulwich will take in local hotspots and notspots, including excellent local hostelries.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10361-tour-de-dulwich/
Share on other sites

Okay, let's draw up some rules here.


1. You must have a two-wheeled, non-motorised mode of transport. Your transport may not include a trolley or other beer conveyance. The judge's decision will be final.


2. You may if you wish fill your water bottles with beer. If you have any water bottles. But otherwise you can do as you wish.


3. You may not crash into another participant or otherwise sabotage him or her. Or you will have to drink another round before setting off again. The judge's decision will be final.


I think that covers it.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> What about trikes i.e tricycles?Two wheels good

> three wheels bad or what?


_______________________________________________________


Once...



Many years ago, I overtook a less physically able person riding ( well hanging off it whilst his legs propelled him ) a trike


So being super conscious of the consequence of knocking someone like this off their "massive red tricycle". I gave him an exaggerated berth as I drove around him, looking back in my rear view mirror just to check his random twitches & foaming spasms hadn't propelled him into my path


Yes what a considerate young driver I was, indeed


I then proceeded to drive straight into the back of a now stationary "Funeral procession" vehicle



The man on the tricycle rode slowly on by, informing me;


"ohww...you crwashed into that car, you know "




W**F


*slightly TRICYCLE bloody phobic*

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a date yet to be announced, Dulwich will play

> host to a brand new Tour de Dulwich.

>

> This road ramble will require participants to take

> part on an unmotorised 2-wheel vehicle of any size

> or shape.

>

> The route of the Tour de Dulwich will take in

> local hotspots and notspots, including excellent

> local hostelries.


Cool B)

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> King of the Sarf London Mountains not good enough

> for you :-S


"In the Tour de France, the leader in the mountains competition wears a distinctive polka dot jersey (French: maillot ? pois rouge)."


I propose we award a jersey called "spotted dick"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...