Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Police have confirmed to the News that a teenager has been stabbed in Hanover Park and Rye Lane in Peckham.


Police were called at about 5.15pm to reports of a man suffering a stab wound.


A 17-year-old boy was taken by air ambulance to a south London hospital where he remains in a stable condition. His injuries are not believed to be life threatening.


Met Police officers have closed the road in Hanover Park.


Bus services: 12, 37, 63, 78, 197, 343, 363 and P12 are being diverted.


Enquiries continue. There have been no arrests.


DulwichFox

I cycled past this 10 mins after it happened but clearly victim and/or perpetrator were still there - lots of police,ambulance and air ambulance hovering above looking for place to land. Big crowd of people laughing, jostling, photographing and videoing events. Made me despair at what humans have become.

Hope victim makes full recovery.

Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of people day and night. Perfectly safe. Like most stabbings, this was probably between two people who know each other - not a lawless random rampage through bargain basements and pound shops! But you are probably right to not wine there Fox. It's usually fully of drunken students stumbling between Canavans and the Bussey - all a bit too young and exciting for you ;)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to see

> here.


Not according to the numerous people photographing and videoing the scene, not just teenagers 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a pushchair was straining to get a good angle for her photo. Lowlife.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of

> people day and night. Perfectly safe.


How does CCTV keep anyone from being stabbed? It'll make sure the incident is filmed as will all those people who are around day and night.

That's really dreadful...



kristymac1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to

> see

> > here.

>

> Not according to the numerous people photographing

> and videoing the scene, not just teenagers

> 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a

> pushchair was straining to get a good angle for

> her photo. Lowlife.

I remember reading somewhere that when Steven Speilberg was young and sirens were heard in his neighbourhood, his mother bundled the family into the car and went off in search of the emergency. She apparently threw her husband out of the house for being boring.....

Just before you judge the 'lowlife' mother straining to get closer to take a look...


I am a doctor, currently on maternity leave. I was taking my baby for a walk in the buggy and came upon the crowd etc. Just as any of my colleagues would do I quickly spoke to the police and offered to help the young victim, while a policeman kept an eye on my baby (kept v close by, and asleep in the buggy).


As it happens the first two people on the scene included an off-duty nurse and they had done pretty much all the necessary, and there was little for me to do before the paramedics arrived, other than be ready in case he deteriorated.


So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping a v close eye on things. (I did not take any photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or there was another mother and buggy close in that I didn't see.)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This happened in Peckham in broad daylight.. at

> 17.00 ish ?

>

> ..It's one of the reason I would never think

> about wining or dining there in the evening or

> waiting for a bus late at night.

>

> DulwichFox


I used to feel far 'safer' and relaxed in Peckham (eg rye lane, waiting for buses) late at night than I ever did on that uneasy stretch of dog kennel hill in ED by sainsburys, ED station and all the way up to goose green.

> So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping

> a v close eye on things. (I did not take any

> photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or

> there was another mother and buggy close in that I

> didn't see.)


Why would I make that up? The woman I saw with a child in s pushchair was standing at the back of the crowd, hence her need to stretch to get a 'good' photo.

Thankfully you were on hand quickly to help and perhaps you were concentrating on the victim to notice just how many lowlife were there. It was horrible, phones out- photographing, videoing, people laughing and jostling. Horrible.

I've seen people doing similar things. I suppose it's always been this way, people in days of old turned up to watch public floggings and much worse. I personally don't get why you'd want to film it, then put it on YouTube or have the images to gawp at yourself, but it's the world we live in

People filming these incidents may inadvertainly be providing evidence useful to police after the event.

So called Police 'super-recognisers' who can put names to faces may well want to look at these clips.


Perpetrators of the crime may well be lurking around in the background.


DulwichFox

Is it legal to post videos of under age crime victims on line without their consent? I can't imagine it is.


Rahrahrah- if you pm me the youtube link I'll contact the company so its taken down.



rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just checked, it's on You Tube. Pretty clear

> that the police were having to battle with

> 'spectators' to keep them back. :-(

Hi Kristymac1


yes, you're quite right. I had seen a photo on social media that had me (my back thankfully) and buggy in shot standing just nearby after the paramedics arrived and really didn't want people to think I was gawping. Phone was firmly in pocket! I didn't pay much attention to everyone else.


I think the young man will be ok. Poor guy.


J

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The person behind the till won't know about whether or not an assignment of their lease has been purchased by a company like Tesco.  Poundland was sold for a nominal fee so it's unsurprising that the location may close soon. As well, for what it's worth, someone working in the shop is likely to have their job impacted by the shop closing, so having loads of people going and asking them about the potential closing of their shop isn't really nice. "Hey, hear you'll be out of a job soon. Know much about that?" The best resource you all should be using for queries about planning details of new shops is the council's website. As was stated on the first page of this post, there's an application lodged for multiple changes at 29-35 Lordship Lane with the client as Tesco. They wouldn't lodge these plans unless it was happening, or at least extremely likely to happen.    The application is on the council's website here: https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SVW246KBKF500&activeTab=summary 
    • It's a notice about a licence, but the only name on it is Poundland.
    • What did the notice on the front door say? The planning applications currently being considered clearly refer to Tesco Stores Ltd.  The signage for above the entrance says "Tesco Express". I can't imagine the two companies combining in the same space 😉  
    • I will find out. Haven't been up there yet!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...