Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Police have confirmed to the News that a teenager has been stabbed in Hanover Park and Rye Lane in Peckham.


Police were called at about 5.15pm to reports of a man suffering a stab wound.


A 17-year-old boy was taken by air ambulance to a south London hospital where he remains in a stable condition. His injuries are not believed to be life threatening.


Met Police officers have closed the road in Hanover Park.


Bus services: 12, 37, 63, 78, 197, 343, 363 and P12 are being diverted.


Enquiries continue. There have been no arrests.


DulwichFox

I cycled past this 10 mins after it happened but clearly victim and/or perpetrator were still there - lots of police,ambulance and air ambulance hovering above looking for place to land. Big crowd of people laughing, jostling, photographing and videoing events. Made me despair at what humans have become.

Hope victim makes full recovery.

Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of people day and night. Perfectly safe. Like most stabbings, this was probably between two people who know each other - not a lawless random rampage through bargain basements and pound shops! But you are probably right to not wine there Fox. It's usually fully of drunken students stumbling between Canavans and the Bussey - all a bit too young and exciting for you ;)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to see

> here.


Not according to the numerous people photographing and videoing the scene, not just teenagers 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a pushchair was straining to get a good angle for her photo. Lowlife.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rye lane is fully covered with CCTV and is full of

> people day and night. Perfectly safe.


How does CCTV keep anyone from being stabbed? It'll make sure the incident is filmed as will all those people who are around day and night.

That's really dreadful...



kristymac1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > An isolated incident. Move along. Nothing to

> see

> > here.

>

> Not according to the numerous people photographing

> and videoing the scene, not just teenagers

> 'grown-ups' too, even a mum with a little one in a

> pushchair was straining to get a good angle for

> her photo. Lowlife.

I remember reading somewhere that when Steven Speilberg was young and sirens were heard in his neighbourhood, his mother bundled the family into the car and went off in search of the emergency. She apparently threw her husband out of the house for being boring.....

Just before you judge the 'lowlife' mother straining to get closer to take a look...


I am a doctor, currently on maternity leave. I was taking my baby for a walk in the buggy and came upon the crowd etc. Just as any of my colleagues would do I quickly spoke to the police and offered to help the young victim, while a policeman kept an eye on my baby (kept v close by, and asleep in the buggy).


As it happens the first two people on the scene included an off-duty nurse and they had done pretty much all the necessary, and there was little for me to do before the paramedics arrived, other than be ready in case he deteriorated.


So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping a v close eye on things. (I did not take any photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or there was another mother and buggy close in that I didn't see.)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This happened in Peckham in broad daylight.. at

> 17.00 ish ?

>

> ..It's one of the reason I would never think

> about wining or dining there in the evening or

> waiting for a bus late at night.

>

> DulwichFox


I used to feel far 'safer' and relaxed in Peckham (eg rye lane, waiting for buses) late at night than I ever did on that uneasy stretch of dog kennel hill in ED by sainsburys, ED station and all the way up to goose green.

> So that's why there was a mother and buggy keeping

> a v close eye on things. (I did not take any

> photos though. Not sure if you made that bit up or

> there was another mother and buggy close in that I

> didn't see.)


Why would I make that up? The woman I saw with a child in s pushchair was standing at the back of the crowd, hence her need to stretch to get a 'good' photo.

Thankfully you were on hand quickly to help and perhaps you were concentrating on the victim to notice just how many lowlife were there. It was horrible, phones out- photographing, videoing, people laughing and jostling. Horrible.

I've seen people doing similar things. I suppose it's always been this way, people in days of old turned up to watch public floggings and much worse. I personally don't get why you'd want to film it, then put it on YouTube or have the images to gawp at yourself, but it's the world we live in

People filming these incidents may inadvertainly be providing evidence useful to police after the event.

So called Police 'super-recognisers' who can put names to faces may well want to look at these clips.


Perpetrators of the crime may well be lurking around in the background.


DulwichFox

Is it legal to post videos of under age crime victims on line without their consent? I can't imagine it is.


Rahrahrah- if you pm me the youtube link I'll contact the company so its taken down.



rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I just checked, it's on You Tube. Pretty clear

> that the police were having to battle with

> 'spectators' to keep them back. :-(

Hi Kristymac1


yes, you're quite right. I had seen a photo on social media that had me (my back thankfully) and buggy in shot standing just nearby after the paramedics arrived and really didn't want people to think I was gawping. Phone was firmly in pocket! I didn't pay much attention to everyone else.


I think the young man will be ok. Poor guy.


J

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...