Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to bounce this seems to me the rule changes, principally no refuelling, have removed the main variable from things. In theory now if I qualify a second quicker than you on a 40 lap race and out pit crews are on a par I will finish 40 seconds ahead of you, so the race is stretching the differences.


Apparently Bernie is trying to get 2 compulsory pit stop so they can take a bit more risk with their tyres and, even better, short cuts to overtake.

Still waiting for mushrooms or blue shells.


(By the way I love F1 and watch all of every race, but this season threatens to be a massive disappointment imho)

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> Apparently Bernie is trying to get 2 compulsory

> pit stop so they can take a bit more risk with

> their tyres and, even better, short cuts to

> overtake.

> Still waiting for mushrooms or blue shells.

>

> (By the way I love F1 and watch all of every race,

> but this season threatens to be a massive

> disappointment imho)

_____________________________________________________


Ruffers...



In less than say 75 words ( so no one falls asleep ) can you expand on the above a little


So we can be F1 "crazeeee..." too



Please ( see my new "nice guy" logo below )



W:):)F

big dissapointment was the opening race.


They need to sort out the aero\dirty air issues - which they've all been aware of for years - and enable overtaking.


bring in some form of nitros turbo boost system (limited number of boosts per race - say 10) - Kers was pants.


Schumacher looks solid though considering he's been away for 3 years...lets give him a couple more races.


However, i fear ferrari will run away this season...unless Alonso and Massa start tripping each other up.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ruffers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

>

> > Apparently Bernie is trying to get 2 compulsory

> > pit stop so they can take a bit more risk with

> > their tyres and, even better, short cuts to

> > overtake.

> > Still waiting for mushrooms or blue shells.

> >

> > (By the way I love F1 and watch all of every

> race,

> > but this season threatens to be a massive

> > disappointment imho)

> __________________________________________________

> ___

>

> Ruffers...

>

>

> In less than say 75 words ( so no one falls asleep

> ) can you expand on the above a little

>

> So we can be F1 "crazeeee..." too

>

>

> Please ( see my new "nice guy" logo below )

>

>

> W:):)F


The "short cuts" are just that. Bernie Ecclestone (who owns/runs F1) has mooted the idea of short cuts on the track that drivers would be allowed to use a maximum number of times per race (3 for example) to enable them to overtake a slower car in front that had been holding them up.


The "mushrooms and blue shells" idea, whilst funny, is a parody of mario kart that enable racers to either go very quickly for a short period or fire a projectile from their car to knock an opponent off the track.


A sidewinder missile might be more appropriate for F1.


*yawn*

Thanks for that David.


I read one suggestion re dirty air was to get rid of diffusers and have a flat bottomed car rule, job done (possibly).


I know it's easy in retrospect but you'd have though someone would have realised that the no refuelling would lead to drivers needing to preserve tyres, meaning they won't follow close and have a real go at an overtake, combined with the key weight/fuel variable being removed as said above = even less overtaking.


What was the reason for refuelling being banned anyway? I can't see it as a cost saving measure like some of the other changes as can't see how it would save money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • By now you’ve hopefully seen that our main demonstration against Trump’s state visit is in London on Wednesday. Many of you have also asked, though, about how you can help ‘welcome’ Donald Trump to Windsor when he arrives there tomorrow (Tuesday) evening. So here’s the plan: We’re asking you to come and line Windsor High Street tomorrow in a peaceful, static protest.  Time: 6pm, Tue 16 Sept Location: Assemble outside Windsor Parish Church, High St, Windsor SL4 1LS and then spread out along the High Street. Grab some cardboard and a pen and make a homemade sign to show Donald Trump and his supporters what you think of them!  The world’s media will be in Windsor to cover the state visit, so showing visually that he is not welcome will send an important message far and wide. If you are coming then please join this Signal chat group for important updates.     Protest safety Please buddy up and come with someone else You have a right to peacefully demonstrate, but we are expecting a high police presence. Remain non-violent and non-confrontational, and do not talk to the police. It may be better to dress inconspicuously, not like an ‘activist’ We plan on ending at 7.30pm. Please leave in groups of 5–10 and make sure you have a bust card This action is entirely legal but we still recommend that you read this key advice when going on a protest to know your rights. Remember:  No comment No personal details Ask ‘under what power?’ No duty solicitor Don’t accept a caution Here is the protest support line: 07946 541 511 and here is more information on Stop & Search under the Public Order Act.   Thank you for being part of the movement against Trump. In solidarity, Stop Trump Coalition
    • We booked a day when we could drop around 8 bags. They directed us to use the rear entrance on Carver Rd. I would definitely ring as they don’t seem to have much space at the back. Our experience was great, they were very polite and thankful.
    • https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/15/police-search-for-11-violent-disorder-suspects-after-unite-the-kingdom-march
    • Should we change the title to Is Starmer toast? The real infighting is just starting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgy79yr74do
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...