Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was very very shocked when I first read about the Milgram experiments in the 1950s. They were very (in)famous experiments but, if you've never come across them, the basic premise is that it was an experiment to see whether one individual could be persuaded to torture another. Milgram concluded that yes, they could; quite easily. Shocking. Someone has replicated the original experiment and nothing's changed; we're still, apparently, ready to torture another human being if an authority figure tells us to.


I truly don't understand the results. I swear that if someone asked me to torture someone I would sit on my hands and tell them go fuck themselves. Am I kidding myself? Does anyone have better insight because I find this so depressing.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7791278.stm

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10448-just-following-orders/
Share on other sites

You're correct that it is a shocking experiment GG. When I first came across it I was horrified. But if you read more, inlcuding some of Milgram's original work, there are points of salvation that help you understand human nature more - and I think that can only be a good thing.


I'd start by just reading the wiki explanations of the interpretations and go from there. The Hofling Hospital experiment shows a similar real life version.


If you're interested in this sort of thing I'd recommend two other famous experiments:


The Rosenhan Experiment - concerns the validity of psychiatric diagnosis


Bystander Apathy - why we do nothing when witnessing crime(s)


Enjoy your new found insight into the human condition!

I saw the documentary this article was related to.

It was indeed incredible to watch - it showed very ordinary people just following very simple instructions, focusing on the task (pressing a button to start an electric shock) and putting their trust in the "authority figure" in his white coat that told them that everything was going to be okay.

It's important to note that there was never any mention of the word "torture" and the experiment demonstrated more participants inability to question the consequences of their actions rather than demonstrating any inherent evil. It showed how the majority of participants, even when their instincts told them they should be concerned, were not confident enough to trust themselves and instead handed responsibility over to the person leading the experiment.

Also take heart from one (albeit less scientific) observation of these experiments. Which is that if you are aware of the experiments and how human beings can behave, that in itself makes you less likely to behave that way should you ever be in such a situation. Which then points to the idea that education might be key to adjusting such behaviour.

From a practical point of view, one of the most worrying aspects of Milgram's findings is how they relate to the conduct of criminal trials (in England and Wales).


In my view, many wrongful convictions arise because jurors tend to convict because they feel that that is what the authorities expect them to do even when the evidence is flawed or insufficient to support such a verdict.


Also, I think that jury polling should be introduced in England to ameliorate potential bias caused by effects such as, for example, conformity within juries during their empanelment. At the moment the deliberations of a jury are kept secret and it's against the law to make any enquiries or revelations about them.

I remember seeing this experiment and the people who refused were generally non-conformist types. I am sure as someone who is not in awe of authority, I would have made my own mind up and not done what was asked of me either.


I think it would be interesting to study the ones who refused and find out exactly what it was that made them different from the ones who just followed orders.

Oh no. Don?t you know that non-conformists are just jealous malcontents, attention seeking exhibitionists or both who only subscribe to their own version of conformity?


Suggesting that they may somehow be more insightful than the general masses is an insult to all the good normal people out there who buy what they are told to, think what they are told to, dress how they are told to, listen to what they are told to, vote how they are told to?




and torture people when they are told to.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh no. Don?t you know that non-conformists are

> just jealous malcontents, attention seeking

> exhibitionists or both who only subscribe to their

> own version of conformity?

>

I've heard quite a few of them live in Surrey.

  • 3 weeks later...

Just finished reading a book by Mark Baker about US veterans in Vietnam. Quite ghastly in some places and obviously a few pyschopaths in the army. But this extract shows how ordinary men can descend into animals.



Finally, dawn came. The battle broke off. There were literally hundreds and hundreds of Vietnamese fleeing the area, any way they could. Panic. ... I don't know if they ran out of ammunition or what, but we were taking very little fire at that point and we were just killing everybody.


It turned into a turkey shoot. They were defenceless. There were three or four light fire teams working the area. Hundreds of people were being mowed down. ... I was in there with the best of them. Blowing people off the boats, out of the paddies, down from the trees. Blood lust. I can't think of a better way to describe it. Caught up in the moment. ... It was a slaughter. No better than lining people up on the edge of a ditch and shooting them in the back of the head. I was doing it enthusiastically.


You begin at that point to understand how genocide takes pace. I consider myself a decent man, but I did mow those people down from my helicopter. A lot of people we were killing in the morning were the same people who were trying to kill us the night before. I tried to compensate in my head that most of the people we were wasting were the enemy. But I could appreciate in a black way that you can take anybody given the right circumstances and turn him into a wholesale killer. That's what I was. I did it. Bizarre. That's what it was. It was very bizarre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...