Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was very very shocked when I first read about the Milgram experiments in the 1950s. They were very (in)famous experiments but, if you've never come across them, the basic premise is that it was an experiment to see whether one individual could be persuaded to torture another. Milgram concluded that yes, they could; quite easily. Shocking. Someone has replicated the original experiment and nothing's changed; we're still, apparently, ready to torture another human being if an authority figure tells us to.


I truly don't understand the results. I swear that if someone asked me to torture someone I would sit on my hands and tell them go fuck themselves. Am I kidding myself? Does anyone have better insight because I find this so depressing.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7791278.stm

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10448-just-following-orders/
Share on other sites

You're correct that it is a shocking experiment GG. When I first came across it I was horrified. But if you read more, inlcuding some of Milgram's original work, there are points of salvation that help you understand human nature more - and I think that can only be a good thing.


I'd start by just reading the wiki explanations of the interpretations and go from there. The Hofling Hospital experiment shows a similar real life version.


If you're interested in this sort of thing I'd recommend two other famous experiments:


The Rosenhan Experiment - concerns the validity of psychiatric diagnosis


Bystander Apathy - why we do nothing when witnessing crime(s)


Enjoy your new found insight into the human condition!

I saw the documentary this article was related to.

It was indeed incredible to watch - it showed very ordinary people just following very simple instructions, focusing on the task (pressing a button to start an electric shock) and putting their trust in the "authority figure" in his white coat that told them that everything was going to be okay.

It's important to note that there was never any mention of the word "torture" and the experiment demonstrated more participants inability to question the consequences of their actions rather than demonstrating any inherent evil. It showed how the majority of participants, even when their instincts told them they should be concerned, were not confident enough to trust themselves and instead handed responsibility over to the person leading the experiment.

Also take heart from one (albeit less scientific) observation of these experiments. Which is that if you are aware of the experiments and how human beings can behave, that in itself makes you less likely to behave that way should you ever be in such a situation. Which then points to the idea that education might be key to adjusting such behaviour.

From a practical point of view, one of the most worrying aspects of Milgram's findings is how they relate to the conduct of criminal trials (in England and Wales).


In my view, many wrongful convictions arise because jurors tend to convict because they feel that that is what the authorities expect them to do even when the evidence is flawed or insufficient to support such a verdict.


Also, I think that jury polling should be introduced in England to ameliorate potential bias caused by effects such as, for example, conformity within juries during their empanelment. At the moment the deliberations of a jury are kept secret and it's against the law to make any enquiries or revelations about them.

I remember seeing this experiment and the people who refused were generally non-conformist types. I am sure as someone who is not in awe of authority, I would have made my own mind up and not done what was asked of me either.


I think it would be interesting to study the ones who refused and find out exactly what it was that made them different from the ones who just followed orders.

Oh no. Don?t you know that non-conformists are just jealous malcontents, attention seeking exhibitionists or both who only subscribe to their own version of conformity?


Suggesting that they may somehow be more insightful than the general masses is an insult to all the good normal people out there who buy what they are told to, think what they are told to, dress how they are told to, listen to what they are told to, vote how they are told to?




and torture people when they are told to.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh no. Don?t you know that non-conformists are

> just jealous malcontents, attention seeking

> exhibitionists or both who only subscribe to their

> own version of conformity?

>

I've heard quite a few of them live in Surrey.

  • 3 weeks later...

Just finished reading a book by Mark Baker about US veterans in Vietnam. Quite ghastly in some places and obviously a few pyschopaths in the army. But this extract shows how ordinary men can descend into animals.



Finally, dawn came. The battle broke off. There were literally hundreds and hundreds of Vietnamese fleeing the area, any way they could. Panic. ... I don't know if they ran out of ammunition or what, but we were taking very little fire at that point and we were just killing everybody.


It turned into a turkey shoot. They were defenceless. There were three or four light fire teams working the area. Hundreds of people were being mowed down. ... I was in there with the best of them. Blowing people off the boats, out of the paddies, down from the trees. Blood lust. I can't think of a better way to describe it. Caught up in the moment. ... It was a slaughter. No better than lining people up on the edge of a ditch and shooting them in the back of the head. I was doing it enthusiastically.


You begin at that point to understand how genocide takes pace. I consider myself a decent man, but I did mow those people down from my helicopter. A lot of people we were killing in the morning were the same people who were trying to kill us the night before. I tried to compensate in my head that most of the people we were wasting were the enemy. But I could appreciate in a black way that you can take anybody given the right circumstances and turn him into a wholesale killer. That's what I was. I did it. Bizarre. That's what it was. It was very bizarre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've used just about all the locally available supermarkets for deliveries over the years, and I now  use Waitrose for deliveries, for various reasons. They have a good range of the things I eat, their food is good quality and their "essentials" range is generally good value (except the tissues, which suddenly became so thin as to disintegrate immediately. I was mainly buying them for the nice plain boxes, so now I just put other tissues into the old Waitrose boxes 🤣) It is very rare for something I've ordered to not be available on the day. Their delivery drivers  are genuinely friendly and helpful. Their customer service is very good. On the rare occasions I've had issues, they have refunded me without quibbling. They often have special deals on some of the things I buy often, so I stock up when they are cheaper. I do occasionally compare prices with other supermarkets, and overall I really don't think Waitrose is more expensive, but obviously they might be for things I don't personally buy. I absolutely hate Sainsbury's, would use Lidl for some things but they don't deliver, Iceland has a very small range of things I eat, and I can't remember why I don't use Tesco or Asda any more. I recently checked out Ocado because there was some offer which seemed good value, but they just didn't have enough things I wanted to buy to make it worth using the offer. M&S don't deliver ( to the best of my knowledge) but in any case they seem to be still badly suffering from the recent hack into their system. Apologies, I have just remembered this thread is about shopping at actual physical stores, but probably many of the issues are the same.
    • Since I am of a certain vintage now, not sure if what I am going to suggest is even still around but here goes… use to be able to buy “dummy/mock papers on line and also had mini synopsis of Shakespeare plays specifically covering students wanting to gain a better understanding of play before taking mocks/ exams. Only know this as many many moons ago, struggled with English Literature and Language and this was the avenue-my parents went down. Also was at this point in my life, educated abroad as part of my fathers job.  
    • Love your comment about “shoehorned” - put a smile on my face..! As for comment about “Little Waitrose” ummmm - never really thought about it. Personally, could not care less. But guess Sainsbury Local and Tesco Express are to you more acceptable.. Ultimately, when I think about it, I actually don’t care what they call themselves - been lured by partially branding and partially convenience and what they offer in groceries.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...