Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our daughter has taken to bombing it up the stairs whenever she gets the chance, but as yet, has no idea about getting down, and when she's on your lap or something, she will happily try to dive straight off you, so I'm worried she'll just try to take a plunge.


Don't want to just put a baby gate at the top of the stairs, as there is a school of thought that suggests the are like a red rag to a bull, and baby will just keep going at it, and they could both end up going down.


I know that going down backwards is safest, but am not sure how to show her this.


Anyone got any tips?

Just physically show her - baby snowboarder and I spent a happy morning up and down stairs recently - he bombed up and I made him slide down on his tummy saying go down backwards.....And then when he tried to nosedive down the one step into the kitchen, I just said backwards, remember, and he turned round...I was SO impressed!!


We do have gates too though....

Hi Keef,


With our little one I put him into the position where he was kneeling on the stairs backwards and moved his legs/knees down the stairs saying "down, down, down" so he was forced into coming down the stairs in the right way.


It took a while but eventually he started doing the motions himself and whenever we said the words "down, down, down" he would automatically start to crawl down backwards. This was really helpful as he always first tried to go head first. This all worked a treat until he started walking when he then wanted to walk down...


He now slides down feet first, on his tummy like a speed demon :-)


We also have gates as I like to be around whenever he heads down the stairs just in case...

Need to think about the gate thing. Definitely plan on getting one at the bottom, but not sure about the top.


Thanks for the tips. It's amazing how difficult it can be trying to show them stuff. I almost fell backwards down the stairs the other day when I was trying to crawl up them!

From the moment when Pebbles junior was able to get up the stairs we pretty much never carried him down again (obviously within reason).


"backwards" was the word that we all used and for a good few weeks we would be in front of him turning him around everytime he tried to go forwards and saying backwards at the same time.


it probably took us 3 weeks in all however we've never had to carry him down the stairs since (apart from fabulous 2 year old tantrum reasons!!!) and we also didn't get stairgates for exactly your reason.


Do stick with it Keef cos although it's a hassle for a few weeks in the long run it makes life sooooo much easier.


Good luck

I understand your reasoning about the gate, we felt that way too. However as previously mentioned, you can leave the gate open for supervised practice but these little ones are fast and it only takes a second of distraction for them to tumble down and really get hurt. I also found it gave my son a bit of independence to toodle around upstairs when the gate was locked and I was just nearby. I think we took it off again around 18 months when we were confident that he had good stair instinct.


But then I have a boy who tended to dive head first off of everything and the gate was probably to calm my poor nerves!

Our daughter has been a keen stair-goer from an early age... she's an adrenalin junkie too. We don't have stair gates, right from the start our mantra has been "backwards backwards backwards", and her older brother also goes down the stairs backwards which helps. At 21 months she's now absolutely fine going up and down by herself, in the earlier days I just made sure she was contained if I was leaving her alone.

We have stair gates top and bottom, but always let the little one do it herself, unless time doesn't allow / tantrums etc.


At the top it means I can shower and she and big sister can play in the bedroom but go back and forth to me, without the stair gate I would be a nervous wreck thinking she might decide to bomb off down the stairs herself - and she too is determined to walk down them now, so it is a bit scary. Of course the other 'problem' to throw into the mix is having a 5 year old sister who is often trying to push past / help / catch her to reclaim a toy or whatever.


I do understand the theory behind not having stairgates, but for me it is just too scary a thought as I know I could get distracted too easily. Hopefully not too much longer to go with them now though.


On rainy days practicing going up and down the stairs is a great way to wear them out!


Molly

We have one very steep set of stairs, and although the nightly dreams about dropping the baby down them have faded (they lasted well over a year, insane me), we still have the gate. Moosling is far too prone to running about like a madman laughing his head off and not looking where he's going. He's absolutely capable of walking up and down the stairs on his own, but I'm fairly sure he's still capable of falling down them too. *shivers*


Anyway, back on topic, when he first started to tackle stairs it was just a question of turning him around when he got to the top and telling him 'backwards' which was clearly counter-intuitive, but he got the hang on it quite quickly and enjoyed all the praise when he did it right.

My little one absolutely refused to come down backwards - so we taught her the bumping bottom method... (does what it says on the tin...).

In fact it when she stands up halfway UP the stairs that it freaks me out, I think that she is going to topple over backwards! It is a 'nobody move or breath or anything' scenario.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...