Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i may have to give up on the independent online, when did it become reddit? (yeah yeah, when arseholes like me stopped paying for the print version, i geddit)


http://www.independent.co.uk/ leads with oooh look, a dog dressed up as a spider dressedup as news


*see what i did there?

All the online versions of newspapers are descending into the same fight for 'clicks' shite - I really can't tell that much difference between the mail/indie/telegraph*/guardian online comments bit. The derrangemnet just swings about a bit politically.


*maybe a bit better as it has a subscription business model

All the papers were losing money hand over fist, then the Mail online suddenly becomes the world's most viewed website by essentially being Heat.

So now the rest of them are attempting to get a share of the pie without quiiiiiite stooping to kim kardashian (except when they stoop to kim kardashian)

I can't say I've ever been part of a religious (or any other) cult, but surely, after being given the orders "you are going to storm a school, kill all the children and then commit suicide" your last remaining functional brain cell would kick in and try to revive your lost humanity?
  • 1 month later...

Interesting piece in the Indy today. Jasmine Alibi-Brown discussing if political satire is a good thing keeping the politicians feet on the ground, or something that is just causing more people to withdraw from the political process.


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/political-satire-is-funny-but-it-also-causes-cynicism-and-apathy-10016819.html


I always considered political satire as a healthy part of democracy, but I can see the point she's making.

Another article on the same issue(ish) but from a US perspective:


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b4e08c58-ae0a-11e4-919e-00144feab7de.html#axzz3RKmHesUo


Worth it just for the quote from H L Mencken:


?Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.?

Also today - the GMB found to have unlawfully discriminated against one of their members on the basis of his left wing socialist views.


From the Times:


The bizarre chain of events began on November 30, 2011, when Keith Henderson, 29, a GMB worker, led a picket line outside parliament on the day of prime minister?s questions. He wrote an article that appeared in two national newspapers asking Labour MPs not to cross the picket line and to stand in solidarity with union members in their action against public sector pension cuts.

His comradely call to arms ?embarrassed? Mr Miliband after the Labour leader was mocked by David Cameron in their weekly joust in the Commons. Mr Miliband?s office phoned Paul Kenny, the GMB general secretary, to convey the Labour leader?s ?displeasure?......


?That was the start of the discrimination I received from the union,? he claimed.

Mr Henderson was sacked from the union after a long-running dispute with his superiors. The report that led to his dismissal was compiled by Warren Kenny, son of the GMB chief and a senior organiser at the union.

Mr Henderson lost his claim for unfair dismissal and unjustified discipline by the union. However, the tribunal judge did find that he had been discriminated against because of his left-wing beliefs. Judge Nigel Mahoney found that ?left-wing democratic socialism is a philosophical belief for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010?.

Well, if he was a drunken twat then the RMT would have backed him.


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/london-tube-strike-millions-face-disruption-in-latest-walkout-over-driver-who-failed-breath-test-10036316.html


If the RMT think he was unlawfully dismissed, take LU to a tribunal or court. Don't bloody well inconvenience the rest of us.

It seems they did, Loz, if you read the whole article. And LU lost. But yet are still sacking the bloke.


"Last year at ACAS (the conciliation service) the RMT offered to call off any strike action if LU agreed to reinstate Alex following an Employment Tribunal ruling that he was dismissed unfairly.


"LU refused even this most reasonable of offers and were unable to give a cogent reason for their refusal."


He said the type of machine used for the alcohol test ?has been known to fail. Indeed a failure was recorded last year at Acton depot when a manager tested positive but the machine was deemed to be faulty.?


So you've got an employer acting unreasonably and with double standards for workers and management.

I can see why you read it that way, DC - it's a terribly written article. But the case has yet to go before a Employment Tribunal and no ruling has yet been made.


If he had won a tribunal case and LU refused to reinstate him, surely that is against the law anyway?

Oh I see....it's all a big "IF"?


Lummy - seemingly its one where both sides need to step back from the brink. An all-out strike seems disproportionate in the circumstances.


Interesting to note how low the voting figures were too. Just around 500 members voting on industrial action of this scale.


"Power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely."


The wider issues within the RMT post Bob Crow are at play here too. There is an internal power struggle going on for the power within the organisation. It's not widely known outside political circles but Bob was a reasonable negotiator and far less militant than the wider membership. He was well aware of the negative publicity tube strikes brought to the RMT.


And then you have the Boris issue. He despises the RMT and is in a pitched battle to drive them out of existence so they are making his last year as mayor as difficult as possible.


The "issue" for the strike is rarely the real reason for it.

Reading between the lines, I guess the RMT have been trying to persuade LU to reinstate the guy pending an ET ruling, as its pretty clear there hasn't already been one. The argument about the machine not working for people with diabetes is a weak one though - my understanding is that this issue was recognised with some types of test kits years ago and different technology adopted.

With 'pink kitchen tables' too!


Harman would have been the first to climb all over the Tories if they tried a stunt like this. I can't believe someone of her political experience can't see just how bad an idea this is.


ETA: A comment on the Guardian report made me laugh: "As a woman I am naturally pulled to garish pink hues. Also, if things are pink then i know they are about women - otherwise I get confused and read about politics and science. Pink helps to signpost me to wimmin's things; like if I see a pink screwdriver I know it's one I can use. Thanks Labour."

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I take back everything I've said about Harriet

> Harman.

>

> She is now electioneering in a pink "Woman to

> Woman" van. Of course I'll vote for her on that

> basis.


I nearly voted for the Conservatives on the strength of that clever poster campaign depicting Blair with the Devil eyes. What a wheeze that was.

  • 3 weeks later...

"Alternative" medicine/health/woo advocate dies after ignoring actual medical advice and treatement instead opting for kilos of fruit juice and coffee-enemas. Mother had previously died after following same treatement plan. Darwinism at work.


http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/mar/01/jessica-ainscough-australia-wellness-warrior-dies-cancer-aged-30


Comment piece:


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/03/what-do-doctors-say-to-alternative-therapists-when-a-patient-dies-nothing-we-never-talk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...