Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Passive smoking. Another of the Nanny State's big lies.


Have you been taken in by the lies and obfuscation of the health fascists (who are paid by Big Pharma) to promulgate these falsehoods?


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100251229/passive-smoking-another-of-the-nanny-states-big-lies/

Roy Castle anyone? I could not go into a pub or club until the smoking was banned because it made me ill. My sinuses would swell up and my eyes would water continuously. I would then have trouble breathing properly. There was no way I was going to live my life on medication for this because it was totally avoidable. So the ban was welcome for me. E-cigs do not affect me...

Also, having a coffee outside a caf? is totally spoiled by chain-smoking twats...mostly foreigners who are still smoking because they were not bombarded with anti-smoking education as we were. This is another health crisis in the UK waiting to happen when they all get copd and lung cancer.

I hope they do prescribe E-cigs on the NHS then at least the government will get the prescription money from it, and the NHS may not crumble and totally die in 20 years time.

And....as for diabetes...why not close down all the unhealthy crappy food shops (you should see the size of school kids who eat this crap) and slap a massive tax on sugar to pay for the NHS?

  • 3 months later...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> New York Times publish front page editorial for

> first time since 1920's, on the subject of gun

> control.

>

> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-

> gun-epidemic-in-america.html?_r=0


I thoroughly commend the calls for US gun control and would like to think this might make those with the necessary clout over there will take notice, but doubt it. Beyond tragic

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...