Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is long one....if you dont have a few mins...move to the next thread...


I realise I should have expected it from logging on to the Gruaniad website, but the following article has me seething...


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/26/women-misogynist-trolls-feminist-internet



A short rant required...


1. So now we have research which shows the the majority of 'misogynist' abuse towards women on the internet comes from young women, not from men. According to the article "now we know many trolls are young women, the searchlight shines on schools? failure to look after children?s well-being". Because, previously, when we thought it was mostly men throwing the abuse, we just thought the men need to learn to control themselves. Now we have to find someone other than the abusers to blame...

2. When referring to male online abusers, the author repeatedly refers to them as 'Sad, Angry Men'; but the implication is that the young women committing the abuse are lovely middle-class princesses; corrupted by the evil patriarchal world

3. The study reveals 10,000 messages in the UK with these abusive terms, so of the ~12m or so internet users and millions of twitter messages, its a drop in the ocean. But of course the PC brigade cant stand by without a parliamentary campaign. We all know there arent any other issues that our politicians could be focusing on.


Don't get me wrong, I'm against any form of abuse, online or otherwise, it just winds me up when a national publication publishes this tripe in the name of 'social justice'....


Rant over. Sorry you had to bother reading if you even got this far.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/108124-feminist-internet/
Share on other sites

If you want to see hoards of the generally female, mostly white, reasonably educated but not the sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian readers too.

root Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you want to see hoards of the generally female,

> mostly white, reasonably educated but not the

> sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look

> at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the

> David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc

> crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian

> readers too.


Just scroll through the EDF for that I'd say!

Or is this a mysogynistic post in itself? Discuss

binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> root Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If you want to see hoards of the generally female,

> > mostly white, reasonably educated but not the

> > sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look

> > at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the

> > David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc

> > crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian readers too.

>

> Just scroll through the EDF for that I'd say!

> Or is this a mysogynistic post in itself? Discuss


Simple answer: No.


More complex answer: No.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
    • Like everyone, super impressed with Leon. Came when he said he would. Gave great advice. Job done really quickly and efficiently. Perfect. Highly recommend 
    • Last December I made a post which said "Peter Mandelson has all the skills and abilities to make an exceedingly good diplomat" and up until yesterday he had undoubtedly demonstrated his abilities. I fear now that the story about relations with Epstein will run and run and the outcome may not be beneficial for either Peter or even Trump.
    • Initially, when all the discussion took place at Bradbury some of existing building was to be demolished which meant that 3 flats would go but these residents would have to wait until new building erected to be housed. No indication has been given as to where people would be placed during building. I am glad that the tree is to remain - Bradbury residents contacted various environmental groups to lobby for tree to remain. I gather that there is likely to be a question of restricted views to be made by Wood Vale residents as 5 stories is significantly higher than current building. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...