Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last night between 23.30-midnight two men were systematically going through the paper recyling in Friern Rood, as Tuesday is collection day most people put their bags out on Monday night. They were wearing high viz jackets using rubbish pincer sticks and torches to rummmage. I was woken up by the sound of the lids being taken off boxes as they looked through for paper. I've reported this to the police but suggest everyone makes sure they shread anything that could lead to identify theft.

Sounds very dodgy.


All the paper recycling bags were removed from our street (Heber Road) last week. I assumed they were removed on collection day & just not being replaced. I'd really like mine back if the council collection guys didn't take it!

Hill Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... two men ... wearing high viz jackets

> using rubbish pincer sticks and torches to rummmage.


> I've reported this to the police ...


Just as likely it was a covert criminal intelligence operation carried out by undercover police officers. They often trawl through suspects' trash bins looking for evidence.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Just as likely it was a covert criminal

> intelligence operation carried out by undercover

> police officers. They often trawl through

> suspects' trash bins looking for evidence.



I'd think if that was the case they'd take the whole bag and leave an empty one in it's place rather than risk tipping off someone they're investigating by going through their stuff outside their house.

We had a full bag nicked one night. I guessed it was for id theft but I shred anything with name and address on anyway just in case it has other information on it that is useful


Recycling. They prefer that loose shredding is not put in the bag as it gos everywhere when they tip it into the lorry. I have been advised to pack it is a paper bag or box and put it in the bag.


I never get round to putting mine in the compost as by the time I remember to empty it the cleaner has already binned it (she is very good at cleaning but not good at recycling)

EDKiwi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > police ... often trawl through

> > suspects' trash bins looking for evidence.

>

> I'd think if that was the case they'd take the

> whole bag and leave an empty one in it's place

> rather than risk tipping off someone they're

> investigating by going through their stuff outside

> their house.


True - but that would also apply to identity thieves, I guess.


I have read of cases where criminals dump their trash some distance from their own homes in order to thwart surveillance so the police might have to trawl around looking for the right bags.


Dumpster diving is quite popular with private detectives, too.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Steve you can recycle shredded paper (if you don't

> have a compost). So it would be the blue bag (tu)



Sorry you can't recycle shredded paper because to recycle paper you need full fibres in the paper and shredding cuts them too small to be able to make them stick together again after they are pulped.

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KalamityKel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Steve you can recycle shredded paper (if you

> don't

> > have a compost). So it would be the blue bag

> (tu)

>

>

> Sorry you can't recycle shredded paper because to

> recycle paper you need full fibres in the paper

> and shredding cuts them too small to be able to

> make them stick together again after they are

> pulped.


Southwark recycling offers to collect shredded paper if placed in a paper bag/envelope and popped in the blue bag. If they cant recycle it then what happens to it eh?


Recycling techniques change with time you know...

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> EDKiwi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAL9000 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > police ... often trawl through

> > > suspects' trash bins looking for evidence.

> >

> > I'd think if that was the case they'd take the

> > whole bag and leave an empty one in it's place

> > rather than risk tipping off someone they're

> > investigating by going through their stuff

> outside

> > their house.

>

> True - but that would also apply to identity

> thieves, I guess.

>

> I have read of cases where criminals dump their

> trash some distance from their own homes in order

> to thwart surveillance so the police might have to

> trawl around looking for the right bags.

>

> Dumpster diving is quite popular with private

> detectives, too.



Very true, guess I should have also qualified that with any cop, or ID theif for that matter, with half a brain would take the whole bag.

I guess the paper recyling bags are an ID theives dream (if the bags owner doesn't shred their stuff).

Could these chaps be council inspectors making sure that people are recycling the right stuff? That would be my conclusion if two people in high vis jackets using the right tools were noisily going through everyone's recycling.

Could these chaps be council inspectors


A group of 4 people in Southwark Council Hi Vis jackets with clipboards are (or were 20 minutes ago) in Underhill Road calling on houses and asking (perfectly reasonable) questions about recycling - i.e. 'is everything working OK?'; 'Do you have dividers for your box?';'Do you know about rewards schemes'; 'Do you know about penalties?' - maybe there is some sort of recycling blitz on - maybe James could advise?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...