Jump to content

Oooh he's nice - I'll vote for him......I think.


Recommended Posts

Apparently women are the most likely to be floating voters and also more likely to have a late change of mind on whom they might vote for.


Hence they are being targeted by all parties.


This election may be won and lost on Mumsnet.....



Disclaimer - This not my view, but the view of the BBC. (So don't shout at me)

I believe women quite rightly don't rush into these decisions. Also they don't necessarily have entrenched political views, hence they are fully entitled to take their time to decide.


Some people think they take longer to understand the issues and then just run out of time, but I don't agree with that, at all.

Oh. Ok then. You probably know best. You're right. I thought I was fine, and just having an interesting chat about politics, but I see now that I was in fact cross and should, as you say, stop. I do need more time to make up my mind. Do tell me, which tv channel should I be watching?

ok the OP was a prompt - it was the bbc's view on the news tonight - do you disagree with this research?




My personal view is that women are (in my experience) less interested in politics than men, possibly because they are less self interested and are primarily less driven by monetary matters than men and are more satisfied by personal and family matters, none of which can be generally influenced by government. They are probably fairer and more accepting, and maybe less demanding of government.

I don't know if I disagree with the research, it's not something I've really thought about. I am not sure I agree that government doesn't affect family matters though - child trust fund? Government funded childcare? State school system/national curriculum? No fault divorce? Child support agency? Maternity rights? Paternity rights? Flexible working legislation?
"monetary matters and are more satisfied by personal and family matters, none of which can be generally influenced by government. They are probably fairer and more accepting, maybe less demanding of government." most women run family budgets/household cash flows. i think women are very motivated, like most people, by issues that affect them.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wot legalb said and, Mick, if you'd actuallly

> listened to the piece on the BBC rather than

> rushing on here you'd have heard the conclusion

> was very much as LBs post....blooody men



stop sucking up.....

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My personal view is that women are (in my

> experience) less interested in politics than men,

> possibly because they are less self interested and

> are primarily less driven by monetary matters than

> men and are more satisfied by personal and family

> matters, none of which can be generally influenced

> by government. They are probably fairer and more

> accepting, and maybe less demanding of government.


Gosh Mick Mac - but you'd vote for anyone that ensured a swift return to original formula midget gems? ;)


Katie*$$$$$$$$*1997

eh? you just listed a load of policies.


My point is that men are more greedy. If you read between the lines you would see that. If you want to argue that women are just as greedy and competitive as men then be my guest. Women are more spiritual and family interested, the issues that matter to them are less open to the governance of others.


As for Quids - he is as predicable as ever.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My personal view is that women are (in my

> > experience) less interested in politics than

> men,

> > possibly because they are less self interested

> and

> > are primarily less driven by monetary matters

> than

> > men and are more satisfied by personal and

> family

> > matters, none of which can be generally

> influenced

> > by government. They are probably fairer and

> more

> > accepting, and maybe less demanding of

> government.

>

> Gosh Mick Mac - but you'd vote for anyone that

> ensured a swift return to original formula midget

> gems? ;)

>

> Katie*$$$$$$$$*1997


Midget gems and a decent secondary school for my girls to go to, to prepare them for motherhood.

I'm a woman, and yeh it's true - this time I really don't know who to vote for. But are there not men who also don't know who to vote for??


Apart from a Liberal (sic) blip once and voting SNP when I lived in Scotland, I've always voted Labour in general elections. Green and other stuff in local elections.


And now - ????


Well it deffo won't be Tory, but I dislike (edited from hate) Gordon Brown as a person but his policies seem OK, and I was never anti the Iraq war because all very well looking at things with hindsight, and blah blah blah.


OK I've had too much Brown Brothers Dry Muscat.


And I do remember the euphoria when Labour got in after zillions of years of Tory rule.


:-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...