Jump to content

Recommended Posts

skidmarks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1. What is the age a single female reaches when

> she must admit to herself that she has missed all

> the good men as they are all now married?

>

> 2. And at what age should a single man admit to

> himself that he is single for a reason?



I think it's about 40 for both.


That is when we women turn into cougars and then at 45, get fed up with that, resigning ourselves to either gathering cobwebs, or swinging!

I cant recommend getting a dog highly enough,not only are they great company,they get you up & out walking or running in the morning/evening,you get to talk to to people,especially if they are cute! [the dog that is!!] I have made loads of friends and met a wonderful girl,who became my girlfriend,alas long gone,whatever you do,do things you enjoy.I take my vicious,huge,but very cute Jack Russell down the pub if I want a chat or a bit of company.

Good luck

Smiler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Friends of friends / friends of friends' friends?

>

>

> Though may be insulted by friends' ideas of people

> who are suitable for you!


Yeah very true. It was suggested I should meet this girl who was a friend of a lady friend, I met her years beforehand and at that time given her the moniker, Bovine Girl.


I was not impressed and far too busy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...