Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was a Labour candidate in Village ward and can confirm that we established that there were paid deliveries made on behalf of the Lib Dems. It was clear which were done in this way because the distributors were carrying bags with "Letterbox Marketing - 020 8940 0666" printed on them. They were happy to volunteer their rate of pay - which was exactly the same as davidh reported at the top of this thread.


Not sure why davidh got so much stick just for pointing out a straightforward fact. Maybe now that the election is behind us there might be a more considered take on this issue?


Duncan Chapman

So dc if this were the case the LD's were paying a company to arrange leafleting and the payment of the leafleters(?) would be from that company not the LD's. davidh made a point of stating that the LD's were paying people less than the minimum wage. Where is the evidence that these people were being paid by the LD's and not the company which employed them? Which 'fact' is so 'straightforward'?

My other half used to deliver the free Southwark Sparrow newsleter a long time ago ( during the reign of the last Southwark Labour Council) we were hard up having been given the option of having no job or being forced to down grade with a ?2000 pa drop in salary. Since other half has a disability - a job was more esential than the pay. Southwark Sparrow paid around 2 pence a copy delivered and if there were any subsequent leaflets/flyers in with the paper, he got ?1.00 per 100 sheets. He would spend several hours each weekend delivering to Burbage and Stradella Road, and another couple of roads off Half Moon Lane. He usually made about ?20 per weekend - which we put towards our grocery bills. OK it was about 10 years ago or such, you could argue that Southwark Labour Council were paying rubbish 'wages' but in fact this was contracted out to local agents who then employed casual deliverers. You got a free delivery bag though!


We have delivered leadlets for our political parties and local residents associations for many years and not received payment.

Duncan,


Personally, I was giving DavidH quite a bit of stick because, as far as I could establish, he was being a disingenuous git. "Oooh, these poor underpaid Polish workers" - yeah, right. He was only concerned because it involved LibDem leaflets.


Is he following up with the right authorities (that does not mean his mates in the local Labour chapter) to ensure that the minimum wage is being paid to the workers?


Now that the election is over, if you, Duncan, want to follow this up and check if this company is underpaying its workers, then you have my full backing. But, if you want to make an issue out of this to use as a stick to beat another political party with, then I suspect you will get much the same response.


PS I hope you weren't the idiot racing around in the car harassing the other leaflet deliverers.

The other thing Duncan, is that I hope you're not so much of a wally to realise this tactic is a double edged sword?


If it transpires that leaflet deliverers (perfectly reasonably) get paid minimum wage, it will also transpire that Labour use them too.


To be honest, your tactics throughout this campaign have been foul. You've called Lib Dems racists allied to the BNP (and the deleted the posting when you were caught out), you've tried to suggest Kevin Donnelly's unsubstantiated smears should go uncriticised, and now you're tripping out on yet another smear.


I mean, come on. Honestly.


When you look in the mirror and try and find reasons for not being elected do you also make things up?


You didn't get elected precisely because you do things like this. People smell a rat. They don't want underhand deceitful backstabbers in power.


The councillor who polled highest in ED was an LD candidate who impresses by his hard work, concern and accessible manner. He wasn't a shitty little slagger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...