Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmmm... Bojo v May. Yes and maybe it will all just be allowed to run on and descend to party politics of a barely in the majority ruling party with no mandate left post 23.6.16. A general election now would hardly bring everyone together.


Golly.


Can't we call him BJ? Just, suits him so well. That's what all of this quite possibly was for him. A great, big, BJ.

Osborne doesn't deserve to enter any race. His puppet master has walked off in a huff after handing the car keys over to a circus act. So time for the puppet to retire gracefully. And fingers crossed, never thought I'd say this, Theresa May will be the one to steady the ship. Just as Harriet Harman did when Miliband stepped down.


Louisa.

Cracking!!


He vows what? Which side was he on?


And he is in ??? what kind of position (by which I mean, not moral position, but actual position as a bank bencher) to give this reassurance?



Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36637037

>

> More breaking news. Boris confirms EU co operation

> will begin immediately.

>

> Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36637037

>

> More breaking news. Boris confirms EU co operation

> will begin immediately.

>

> Louisa.



I'm really not entirely clear from reading that quite what Boris means will happen. Am I being stupid (not impossible on any given day, quite likely right now), or is that a massive fudge?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Osborne doesn't deserve to enter any race. His puppet master has walked off in a huff after

> handing the car keys over to a circus act.


Actually, it was never quite clear who was the puppet master and who was the puppet in that double act.

Boris again continuing to make promises he can't keep. Britain will continue to be in the free market, freedom of movement will continue and Scotland isn't entitled to/won't get a second referendum "there's no appetite" apparently. Bizarre.


So let's tell everyone it's all going to be fine, and continue to piss off the Scots in the process. What's wrong with this guy?


Louisa.

Lou, Boris is just, god knows. He has no power to say what will happen. Just as he had no power to promise you no recession. He is probably hoping he can somehow back peddle to remain.

Article 50 is the only power any new PM will have left. Do I push the button or do I not?

Once he pushes that button, all the power will pass to the EU to say what our terms of exit are. And those terms will be restricted to allocation of our contributions in the interim period (post trigger pre departure), and what happens to EU citizens living in the UK (and UK citizens living in the EU). Then we leave the EU. If we don't like the terms offered on those limited topics (which is all clause 50 is about), they get to impose their proposals on us by a majority vote (which obviously we get no vote in). Free trade, free movement of persons, all of that, goes, after the clause 50 trigger process ends and we exit. Clause 50 does not entitle the EU to give us a trade deal. That's a whole other process which they have already said they will not do in parallel. (Hard to see how they could, legally or pragmatically. And anyhow, they won't, because they don't want us using their citizens over here or our limited future contributions as bargaining chips in any re-entry process. So the processes will be separate. All that posturing by Farage, Boris, blooming Dyson, about how easy and quick and inevitable a new trade deal would be, was men having a pissing contest in a urinal. That is all that was.)

When, and only when, we are out, do we get to add our name to the list of countries who want to join the EU. Which may not even happen. And if it does, we have no power to dictate terms of re-entry - zero.

Yes, Blah Blah is right. When i said PM push the button, what I should have said was, PM/government propose legislation that would - if passed by Parliament (both houses) - invoke article 50.


And there is a risk that parliament will refuse to pass article 50 legislation - as some MPs have already said they will. The referendum was not a plebiscite (not people made law). It was just supposed to be advice to our MPs.

But surely if Article 50 already allows for Govts to use it, they don't need an Act to go down that road?


(Seriously, I've been lacking on sleep lately so it's possible I'm being really thick about this, but nowhere have I seen anything that said Parliament needed to be consulted. Very happy to be wrong about it)

What Cameron really should do tomorrow, is call a press conference (bare in mind his political career is now all but over so no face loss), and tell the nation that he will need ratification from the regionally devolved parliaments before he can invoke Article 50, more or less handing over the process to the regions. Scotland and NI votes against invoking of Article 50, and Cameron announces under such circumstances which threaten the stability of the union, he cannot invoke Article 50 and returns to the EU and tells them for reasons of stability the UK will be remaining in the EU.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...