Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

> >

> > > Effectivly the ?350m is correct. It's like your wages.. You get what is left after Tax. National

> > > Insr. & stoppages.

> >

> > Foxy, even Farage has admitted the ?350m/week

> > figure was a bare-faced lie.

> >

> > And your analogy is wrong. It's more like getting 40% off a ?1000 television, and then telling

> > everyone you paid ?1000 for your TV. It's a lie.

>

> Dont see the connection.. but along the same lines

>

> Its like paying ?53 ffor a t-shirt marked down

> from ?75.00* and thinking you have saved ?22.00

> when its only worth ?6.00

>


I think you are now being purposely obtuse, Foxy. No one is that stupid.


I notice you also skipped over the fact that Farage has admitted the ?350m/week was a lie.

No matter what, the silly old Fox won't back down


Even if he was on fire, he'd not admit it was burning him


He's got O.D.D I reckon, so ignore him, it's a waste of your effort, it's pure attention seeking on his behalf


But if you want Morris dancing or a card trick, he's your go to guy

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > DulwichFox Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > >

> > > > Effectivly the ?350m is correct. It's like

> your wages.. You get what is left after Tax.

> National

> > > > Insr. & stoppages.

> > >

> > > Foxy, even Farage has admitted the ?350m/week

> > > figure was a bare-faced lie.

> > >

> > > And your analogy is wrong. It's more like

> getting 40% off a ?1000 television, and then

> telling

> > > everyone you paid ?1000 for your TV. It's a

> lie.

> >

> > Dont see the connection.. but along the same

> lines

> >

> > Its like paying ?53 ffor a t-shirt marked down

> > from ?75.00* and thinking you have saved ?22.00

>

> > when its only worth ?6.00

> >

>

> I think you are now being purposely obtuse, Foxy.

> No one is that stupid.

>

> I notice you also skipped over the fact that

> Farage has admitted the ?350m/week was a lie.


And I notice that you missed out the bit where I said that the offer was in an E.D. Shop.. Question Air in fact

and there are people that stupid.


Foxy.

Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions on this forum, and I would never knowingly undermine you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid. Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and just admit, look I've got it wrong.


We have been lied to on this and I honestly believe we will come to regret our decision.


Louisa.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No matter what, the silly old Fox won't back down

>

> Even if he was on fire, he'd not admit it was

> burning him

>

> He's got O.D.D I reckon, so ignore him, it's a

> waste of your effort, it's pure attention seeking

> on his behalf

>

> But if you want Morris dancing or a card trick,

> he's your go to guy


Gave up dancing in 1992.. so sorry, cant help you ..


As for O.D.D.

My boss once said. Bad Points

**** will never let the subject drop and will continue arguing his point


... Then he said.. Good Points

**** is a good engineer. He will never give on any Technical Problem until he finds a solution.



Yep I am tenacious. That is true. But tenacious people who may really wind some people up are good problem solvers and get things done.


And do not go on about narcissism... I am defending the O.D.D. accusation.


Foxy.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have respect for people's opinion, but on this I

> can no longer justify the decision that has been

> made. Not only have we, the brexit supporters been

> lied to in a big way. We have also overseen the

> potential collapse of our political system as well

> as upsetting the international community, many of

> them close friends and allies. We have also

> allowed a vacuum to develop in which some rather

> distasteful opinions have emerged which are making

> some people who are guests and great contributors

> to our country feel unwelcome and deeply

> troubled.

>

> Foxy and toffee, you have both been lied to on

> this and that really isn't any exaggeration. We

> need to respect the fact that some people have

> been hit quite hard by this decision we have made

> and it seems to me that we should now have a

> period of calm reflection, in which some of us

> hold our hands up, admit we have been wrong- and

> somehow help to fix the mess we have unknowingly

> unleashed on the population.

>

> Louisa.


Respect, Louisa..!

Early election..?


Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 there are only two ways to get an early General Election 1] Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 only a motion explicitly resolving "That this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government" is treated as a motion of no confidence which, if carried, triggers a general election. A government can lose a vote of no confidence by a majority of just over 50%, requiring it to resign. Parliament will be dissolved if no new government can be formed within 14 days of a no-confidence vote. 2] The Act also permits early dissolution if the House of Commons votes by a supermajority of two-thirds. The second option is unlikely to happen. The first will be unpalatable to the incumbent government so how viable is an early election..? Should these not occur, the election will take place on 7 May 2020.


Alternatively they could repeal the Act entirely but what about the Lords & other legal challenges..?

Yes I don't think it will suit Labour to have an early election (they have no money for one right now), so can not see a challenge to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act being sucessful through the house. Repeal of the Act would also take time.
  • Administrator

Hi Louisa


In light of your post and the fact you're being honest in admitting your decision was wrong, I find that very admirable and you have the freedom of the forum back. Of course if you hijack threads and take them down the class warfare route again you will be sectioned again but in the meantime... go make hay...


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions on

> this forum, and I would never knowingly undermine

> you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid.

> Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and

> just admit, look I've got it wrong.

>

> We have been lied to on this and I honestly

> believe we will come to regret our decision.

>

> Louisa.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Louisa

>

> In light of your post and the fact you're being

> honest in admitting your decision was wrong, I

> find that very admirable and you have the freedom

> of the forum back. Of course if you hijack threads

> and take them down the class warfare route again

> you will be sectioned again but in the meantime...

> go make hay...

>

> Louisa Wrote:





> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Foxy, you know I respect your valued opinions

> on

> > this forum, and I would never knowingly

> undermine

> > you. But on this one you are wrong I'm afraid.

> > Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up and

> > just admit, look I've got it wrong.

> >

> > We have been lied to on this and I honestly

> > believe we will come to regret our decision.

> >

> > Louisa.



Sorry for going pff topic but this reminds me of

last nights Game of Thrones. Repent and obey, watch out for the wyldefire Louisa.

Thankyou Admin for my reinstatement. I shall weigh up my options, and consider whether I want to spark the EDF version of Article 50, by once again posting outside of the Lounge.


I think it is only right to accept the fact that I am a polarising figure, and my return to the rest of the forum will cause some turmoil for a brief period at least. At this time of forum uncertainty, let me be clear. I shall not be posting in the main section anything regarding class, hipsters, yummy mummies or gastropubs. I will however, speak my mind about the coming of M&S and its detrimental effect on the local population (from all social classes), and my sadness at the loss of Iceland.


Finally, let me just say this. It has been a pleasure being confined to the lounge this last year. I have discovered a new purpose, a purpose far beyond the neatly trimmed hedgerows of ED. I can now admit when I am wrong, and I can weigh up my options before coming in full throttle.


Louisa.

Note to JoeLeg- no, not on medication nor in total denial, rather a pragmatist who just gets on with the job, and knows we've been through worse. I would suggest that patronising comments such as yours from a supposed position of superiority is what had nearly 17 & a half million of us screaming for the leave button! Sigh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...