Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > I always thought you were a Thatcher fan, Jah.

>

> How dare you. I hated that witch. You've not

> listed to the song have you?


I barely got past the first 15 seconds, jumped a minute or so to see if it improved and then gave up.


So, no.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I always thought you were a Thatcher fan, Jah.

>

> How dare you. I hated that witch. You've not

> listened to the song have you?


Not PC to hate...how about detest..? That'll do for me.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a serious note . Would be a good thing Steveo - the boys have hardly made a good thing of it

> recently and if you add in Ruth ???? In Scorland then they all look pretty good (Clinton excepted)


They're not all good.


Theresa May, Ruth Davidson, Sturgeon, Merkel, Caroline Lucas - Very, very competent.


Clinton - Capable and will do the job, but question marks. Has huge advantage of being 'not Trump'.


Angela Eagle, Kezia Dugdale - Really not sure. Eagle did well at her one dispatch box, but just can't see her holding Labour together. Dugdale is being completely outshone by Davidson and Sturgeon.


Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (still Green leader) - seem way out of their depth.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a serious note . Would be a good thing Steveo

> - the boys have hardly made a good thing of it

> > recently and if you add in Ruth ???? In Scorland

> then they all look pretty good (Clinton excepted)

>

> They're not all good.

>

> Theresa May, Ruth Davidson, Sturgeon, Merkel,

> Caroline Lucas - Very, very competent.

>

> Clinton - Capable and will do the job, but

> question marks. Has huge advantage of being 'not

> Trump'.

>

> Angela Eagle, Kezia Dugdale - Really not sure.

> Eagle did well at her one dispatch box, but just

> can't see her holding Labour together. Dugdale is

> being completely outshone by Davidson and

> Sturgeon.

>

> Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (still

> Green leader) - seem way out of their depth.


To be fair to Leanne Wood, the Labour party still rules

Wales and she had to admit that Wales doesn't have the

resources for independence.


So it's rather difficult for her to act powerful and Nationalist :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...