Jump to content

Here Come the Girls

steveo

By steveo
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > I always thought you were a Thatcher fan, Jah.

>

> How dare you. I hated that witch. You've not

> listed to the song have you?


I barely got past the first 15 seconds, jumped a minute or so to see if it improved and then gave up.


So, no.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I always thought you were a Thatcher fan, Jah.

>

> How dare you. I hated that witch. You've not

> listened to the song have you?


Not PC to hate...how about detest..? That'll do for me.

Loz

Loz

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a serious note . Would be a good thing Steveo - the boys have hardly made a good thing of it

> recently and if you add in Ruth ???? In Scorland then they all look pretty good (Clinton excepted)


They're not all good.


Theresa May, Ruth Davidson, Sturgeon, Merkel, Caroline Lucas - Very, very competent.


Clinton - Capable and will do the job, but question marks. Has huge advantage of being 'not Trump'.


Angela Eagle, Kezia Dugdale - Really not sure. Eagle did well at her one dispatch box, but just can't see her holding Labour together. Dugdale is being completely outshone by Davidson and Sturgeon.


Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (still Green leader) - seem way out of their depth.

JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a serious note . Would be a good thing Steveo

> - the boys have hardly made a good thing of it

> > recently and if you add in Ruth ???? In Scorland

> then they all look pretty good (Clinton excepted)

>

> They're not all good.

>

> Theresa May, Ruth Davidson, Sturgeon, Merkel,

> Caroline Lucas - Very, very competent.

>

> Clinton - Capable and will do the job, but

> question marks. Has huge advantage of being 'not

> Trump'.

>

> Angela Eagle, Kezia Dugdale - Really not sure.

> Eagle did well at her one dispatch box, but just

> can't see her holding Labour together. Dugdale is

> being completely outshone by Davidson and

> Sturgeon.

>

> Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (still

> Green leader) - seem way out of their depth.


To be fair to Leanne Wood, the Labour party still rules

Wales and she had to admit that Wales doesn't have the

resources for independence.


So it's rather difficult for her to act powerful and Nationalist :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Angelina
      The Johnson papers

      By Angelina · Posted

      he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • malumbu
      The Johnson papers

      By malumbu · Posted

      Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • jazzer
      The Johnson papers

      By jazzer · Posted

      1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • jazzer
      Mahmood says she could......

      By jazzer · Posted

      My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...