Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It brings to mind the parable of the rich man making a show of his huge donation to charity and making sure everyone sees him. Then a little old lady is embarrassed by her meager contribution. The moral being that the fat cat gave less than he would ever even notice not having and the little old lady gave all that she had.

I think (except for a small number of noble exceptions) human nature is to look after number one and get away with as much as possible - regardless of how much you have. A spot of tax evasion here, a bit of cash-in-hand there.


'The Poor' always say it's because they aint got naaffin' and life is 'ard. But when any of them 'make it' they retire to enormous new-builds in Surrey, realise that their tax burden is actually now around %50 of their income and immediately hire a clever accountant to give away as little as possible - cos they bleedin' earned it, didn't they?

The poor believe themselves to be the most generous because they haven't got much.. so if they put 10p in a tin they're a saint.


The rich believe themselves to be the most generous because without their grand donations to charity and higher tax contributions the country would be on its knees.


The middle classes worry and debate endlessly about whether they're generous enough with their cash or not - and err on on the of caution by just keeping as much of it as they possibly can (like everyone else).

hmmmmm. In my observation as an outsider to this horrible little thing known as the british class system the divide between middle and working class is not clearly defined along financial lines anymore. It seems more about how people see themselves or more importantly how they want people to see them.
Ha! I was wondering when someone was going to bring up the dreaded C word again. The middle classes in general I have found to be as tight as two coats of paint. But let's put it this way, CitizenED's post got it about right IMHO, although in my experience and I have friends who are extremely rich and friends with absolutely nothing but on the whole it's the latter rather than the former who I have found to be more generous with their time, money and spirit. And if I can quote the late Jeffrey Bernard here "you meet a better class of person in the gutter."

Jah - couldn't agree with you more. When I moved into my new house in Feb, my next door neighbour, the only other council tenant in my row of houses, gave me a welcome present, has given me stuff for my granddaughter and bones etc for the dog, they invited my daughter to their granddaughter's birthday party and helped me clear the jungle that was my back garden.


The rest of my neighbours are all nice as it goes, but these ones who have been the most generous aren't working.


I have friends with money but more friends who are broke (like me), and I find the ones who have little, care less about hording their money and tend to live for the day. When I had my own business and started making serious money (it's all gone now!) I helped everyone I knew, because I'd been broke before and knew how it felt. When I was later on my @rse, many of the people I'd helped were there for me.


If my neighbour needs help with anything that is within my power to help with, I've got her back.


Thats how you survive at the bottom, but people who have never had to struggle don't understand this way of banking.

Whilst I agree that rich people are the tightest I think it's important to note that 'this way of banking' relies heavily on the giro.


Being generous with other people's money is of debatable merit and giving up time when you are out of work is probably preferable to staying up all night watching jobfinder on Ceefax.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sounds like one for trading standards 
    • The Herne Hill Forum is raising money to replace the much-loved but decrepit wooden children’s trains outside Herne Hill station. The new train benches will be made of stainless steel with seasoned oak slats to sit on. The design is based on the Lord Nelson Class engines which passed through Herne Hill Station between 1926 and 1962 and the Pullman carriages in service at the same time. The trains will be painted green, the livery colour for Southern Railway in the 20s and 30s. Youngsters peering inside the carriages will glimpse some unexpected passengers: penguins commuting to work, an owl in a flap, a ghost on its way to Halloween, a fox and his friends, a heron migrating back to the hill and a bear checking tickets have all been smuggled on board. The carriages themselves will be clad with painted wooden boards for local artists and school children to repaint when necessary. The quality of the materials and the design should ensure the trains’ longevity but also come at a price. To cover the costs, the Forum has launched a crowd funding campaign and if all goes well, the new train benches should be installed by the spring.  Back the project here: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/herne-hill-train-benches (Admin, we know this is not ED but we didn't feel it was right for the Lounge so have put it here, given many ED-ers use Herne Hill. Apologies if it's in the wrong place!)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...