Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As if we haven't seen/heard enough from all the back-stabbing, two-faced, back-tracking national politicians, now the local slime bags are getting in on the act.


The chairman of the Local Government Association, Lord Porter, has said " The government was extremely foolish to ask the UK electorate the EU question when it didn't know what the answer would be".


You really just could not make it up for a satirical sketch show, could you!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112919-and-now-at-local-level/
Share on other sites

Foolish to divide the country. Foolish to throw it into economic turmoil. Foolish to leave it at the mercy of leading politicians who, whilst campaigning to leave the EU, had not the slightest real wish to win the referendum and - once they'd done so - had no alternative plan to put in place.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?



It was done - and the result happened


But things are better decided by a manifesto commitment

and voting at a general election IMHO


Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> adonirum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jenny1 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > But wouldn't you agree that that was

> extremely

> > > foolish?

> >

> > What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?

>

>

> It was done - and the result happened

>

> But things are better decided by a manifesto

> commitment

> and voting at a general election IMHO

>

Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)


The EU referendum was NOT voted on line. We had Polling Cards and voted at Local Polling Stations.

Unless I've missed something. ?


DulwichFox

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What do you mean by "slime bags" and who are the

> local ones? Why do you call Porter one?



I have used slime bags as a generic description of all politicians at all levels, and, by local ones, again I was referring to local councillors as a whole, and not necessarily specific to ED.


I can see where the confusion may have arisen by using definite article "the", and perhaps I could have made that easier to interpret by just stating "now local slime bags" to show the generalisation.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?


Cameron gave no thought to a Leave vote - just assumed a remain.


Then even worse no long term debate - did we ever discuss what sort of UK we want

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL didn't say the referendum was done via

> online voting.

> He was supposing the situation if on-line format

> was used for referenda on all issues.

> Unless I missed something.


That's what I meant - assuming no abuse - everyone a single vote and

we vote for issues and then the government implements them.


Would probably be awful :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...