Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As if we haven't seen/heard enough from all the back-stabbing, two-faced, back-tracking national politicians, now the local slime bags are getting in on the act.


The chairman of the Local Government Association, Lord Porter, has said " The government was extremely foolish to ask the UK electorate the EU question when it didn't know what the answer would be".


You really just could not make it up for a satirical sketch show, could you!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112919-and-now-at-local-level/
Share on other sites

Foolish to divide the country. Foolish to throw it into economic turmoil. Foolish to leave it at the mercy of leading politicians who, whilst campaigning to leave the EU, had not the slightest real wish to win the referendum and - once they'd done so - had no alternative plan to put in place.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?



It was done - and the result happened


But things are better decided by a manifesto commitment

and voting at a general election IMHO


Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> adonirum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jenny1 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > But wouldn't you agree that that was

> extremely

> > > foolish?

> >

> > What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?

>

>

> It was done - and the result happened

>

> But things are better decided by a manifesto

> commitment

> and voting at a general election IMHO

>

Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)


The EU referendum was NOT voted on line. We had Polling Cards and voted at Local Polling Stations.

Unless I've missed something. ?


DulwichFox

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What do you mean by "slime bags" and who are the

> local ones? Why do you call Porter one?



I have used slime bags as a generic description of all politicians at all levels, and, by local ones, again I was referring to local councillors as a whole, and not necessarily specific to ED.


I can see where the confusion may have arisen by using definite article "the", and perhaps I could have made that easier to interpret by just stating "now local slime bags" to show the generalisation.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?


Cameron gave no thought to a Leave vote - just assumed a remain.


Then even worse no long term debate - did we ever discuss what sort of UK we want

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL didn't say the referendum was done via

> online voting.

> He was supposing the situation if on-line format

> was used for referenda on all issues.

> Unless I missed something.


That's what I meant - assuming no abuse - everyone a single vote and

we vote for issues and then the government implements them.


Would probably be awful :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...