Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I voted remain. The fact you think otherwise Just illustrates the inflexibility of your binary, simplistic world view. My point is that if people hadn't dismissed the concerns of people about immigration as 'racist' and engaged with them and let a discussion develop then my feel is the outcome would have been different but it was closed down by the 'bigots' of the left on the grounds of bigotry, ironically.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Sanctimony" and "specifically" by

> the way, and self-righteous has a hyphen; if

> you're going to have a stab at the big words do

> try to get them right.




Right there is where you lost the crowd and came over like an arse.

Whilst no one can know what is in another person's heart - I do think Farage is probably quite racist. Whilst I'm sure he'd condemn the loud punchy, out there type of racists (too crass) - That poster, the talking about immigrants bringing crime and disease, complaints about people on the tube talking in foreign languages - you don't have to read too hard between the lines. Sure, it's racism of the polite, banal, guarded type, that's not at all uncommon (especially amongst people of his generation and older). In someways it's a far more insidious.


This is the thing, when people say that it's a 'small minority of racists', I am not so sure that's correct. I think racism is actually incredibly pervasive, just subtle.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I voted remain. The fact you think otherwise Just

> illustrates the inflexibility of your binary,

> simplistic world view. My point is that if people

> hadn't dismissed the concerns of people about

> immigration as 'racist' and engaged with them and

> let a discussion develop then my feel is the

> outcome would have been different but it was

> closed down by the 'bigots' of the left on the

> grounds of bigotry, ironically.


You see, that's rather revealing: nowhere did I say I thought you voted for Brexit, and in fact I know you didn't as you've mentioned that you voted Remain several times on various threads. But you've created a scenario in your head that I assume you voted Brexit, so you can then say that shows how closed minded I am.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Right there is where you lost the crowd and came

> over like an arse.


Well, I wasn't arguing for a crowd but against one person who thinks I'm an arse anyway, so I'll try not to lose too much sleep over it.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't like his politics or campaigning but ...

> I'm not sure being anti-European immigration technically counts as racism.


Same here, as much as I dislike him, I don't find his position inherently racist (although some campaign material might be). Foolish, wrong, and divisive, but not necessarily racist. Of course we all know that plenty of people voted out for racist or xenophobic reasons (consciously or unconsciously), but it would be foolish to label half the country as small-minded bigots.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't like his politics or campaigning but

> ...

> > I'm not sure being anti-European immigration

> technically counts as racism.

>

> Same here, as much as I dislike him, I don't find

> his position inherently racist (although some

> campaign material might be). Foolish, wrong, and

> divisive, but not necessarily racist. Of course we

> all know that plenty of people voted out for

> racist or xenophobic reasons (consciously or

> unconsciously), but it would be foolish to label

> half the country as small-minded bigots.


Quoted in the Daily Telegraph of all places (so not some "middleclass liberal journal"):


Phillips asks: ?In Ukip-land there would be no law against discrimination on the grounds of nationality. Would there be a law against discrimination on the grounds or race or colour??


?No,? Nigel Farage responds.


Full article here, if you're interested, which makes a pretty convincing case that Farage is a racist:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage/11467713/No-dogs.-No-blacks.-No-Irish-is-now-Ukip-policy.html

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst no one can know what is in another persons

> heart - I do think Farage is probably quite

> racist. Whilst I'm sure he'd condemn the loud

> punchy, out there type of racists - That poster,

> the talking about immigrants bringing crime and

> disease, complaints about people on the tube

> talking in foreign languages - you don't have to

> read too hard between the lines.

>

> Sure, it's racist in quite a polite, banal,

> subtle, guarded manner - The acceptable face of

> racism. It's that 1970's, casual, almost

> instinctive, everyday racism, which is not at all

> uncommon (especially amongst people of his

> generation and older. In someways it's far more

> insidious.

>

> This is the thing, when people say that it's a

> 'small minority of racists', I am not so sure

> that's correct. I think racism is actually

> incredibly pervasive, it's just not that shouty,

> out there type which everyone can comfortably

> condemn because it's so crass.


I agree with this rahrahrah. I remember those attitudes very well from the 1970s. And I think Farage embodies them.


My view would be that the emotions that drive these ideas are fear and insecurity. Where they originated for Farage personally I couldn't say. But they carry more traction with a wider public when economic conditions are tougher. So it seems natural they're now coming to the surface in a time of austerity, in the same way as they did in the bad old days of the three-day-week. There's a kind of turning inwards, and lashing outwards, that happens at such times.


As many others have pointed out it's the economic crash of 2008 that set the scene for the dramas playing out today. Without that Farage would have remained a lone, and largely unheeded, voice in the wilderness. But it's chilling to think that far worse people have risen to power in similar circumstances.

I have no idea if Farage is a racist - I don't see how anyone can be certain either way. He is a populist, though, and did appeal to xenophobic impulses to get votes, I don't think that's controversial.


In the olden days, it is my understanding, UKIP had something of an academic anti-EU position, with libertarian guiding principles. There was an LSE academic named Sked who was the top dog. There is nothing philosophical or academic about the party anymore - it's an anti-immigration party, with the indefensible "faceless bureaucrats" shtick bolted on for legitimacy.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no idea if Farage is a racist - I don't see

> how anyone can be certain either way. He is a

> populist, though, and did appeal to xenophobic

> impulses to get votes, I don't think that's

> controversial.

>

> In the olden days, it is my understanding, UKIP

> had something of an academic anti-EU position,

> with libertarian guiding principles. There was an

> LSE academic named Sked who was the top dog. There

> is nothing philosophical or academic about the

> party anymore - it's an anti-immigration party,

> with the indefensible "faceless bureaucrats"

> shtick bolted on for legitimacy.


Yes, Sked (a former Liberal candidate) formed the party as a single-issue anti-Maastricht (sp?) party but was forced out by Farage and others who decided he was too intellectual. After he'd left he said that UKIP had been taken over by far-right and racist elements.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Green Goose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Commission, which is the Executive ie makes

> all the decisions ( headed by Junker) is

> unelected.

>

> Only if you consider the Prime Minister and the

> cabinet unelected. The commission is comprised of

> 1 person from each country, appointed by each

> elected national government.

>

> Since you have no idea how the EU works, GG,

> here's some unbiased reading for you...

>

> https://fullfact.org/europe/eu-facts-behind-claims

> -brussels-bureaucrats/

>

> "The Commission is perhaps the most visible EU

> institution, but it is not necessarily the most

> powerful and is certainly not the government of

> Europe."


I haven't seen a return on any of these factual rebuttals of the "faceless bureaucrats" and "unelected dictators" shtick. Anywhere. Yet people hold onto their beliefs.


What I take away from this, and from the referendum, is that there is a large section of the population who are mentally incapable of processing simple information, but are very certain of their beliefs.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Full article here, if you're interested


Arguments either way... I don't think a laissez-faire approach to employment law is conclusive evidence of racism, but yes I agree it does sound very dodgy and undesirable.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Full article here, if you're interested

>

> Arguments either way... I don't think a

> laissez-faire approach to employment law is

> conclusive evidence of racism, but yes I agree it

> does sound very dodgy and undesirable.


You're right of course, but I think it at very least shows an "I'm not racist but I don't care if other people are" attitude.

Whether he is racist or not however, I do think he is odious. That 'facepalm' speech he made the other day in the European parliament was pathetic in the true sense of the word. It was his moment, the culmination of years of campaigning and whether you agree with him or not (I don't), it should have been a proud, victorious moment for him. Instead of being magnanimous, of making the most of it, he insulted everyone and came across as mean, petty and deeply insecure.

In some sense - who cares? He was a marginal figure, at his peak his party managed 12% of the popular vote, disappeared after the election, re-appeared for the referendum, but no one serious wanted anything to do with him, so he had to front his own Leave campaign and was shunted out of any theoretical negotiating team. More bark than bite, thank goodness.


As Louisa said - his only real chance is to join some breakaway Cons faction.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whether he is racist or not however, I do think he

> is odious. That 'facepalm' speech he made the

> other day in the European parliament was pathetic

> in the true sense of the word. It was his moment,

> the culmination of years of campaigning and

> whether you agree with him or not (I don't), it

> should have been a proud, victorious moment for

> him. Instead of being magnanimous, of making the

> most of it, he insulted everyone and came across

> as mean, petty and deeply insecure.


http://i.imgur.com/VBp1vuF.jpg?1

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Right there is where you lost the crowd and

> came

> > over like an arse.

>

> Well, I wasn't arguing for a crowd but against one

> person who thinks I'm an arse anyway, so I'll try

> not to lose too much sleep over it.



On a public forum.


It's just a real pet hate of mine when people pick at a person's spelling or grammar in order to try to dismiss what they are actually saying.


And you seem a decent person, so just play the ball not the man as the saying goes :-)

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's just a real pet hate of mine when people pick

> at a person's spelling or grammar in order to try

> to dismiss what they are actually saying.

>

> And you seem a decent person, so just play the

> ball not the man as the saying goes :-)


Well, fair point - I wouldn't usually do it, in fact I haven't to anyone else on this forum as far as I recall, but ???? replied to my post with "Oh such sanctomy - yes teacher" - having a bit of a dig at an argument we had on another thread about today's teacher's strike, so I couldn't resist the bait.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whether you agree with Farage's views or not, it's

> hard to deny he achieved his goal.



The jury is out on whether he achieved it or not. He may frequently pop up to blast the government if he feels they haven't gone far enough in breaking with Europe or dealing with immigration. And to be honest I doubt anything they do will be good enough for him. So no, I don't think he'll ever feel he's achieved his real, true goals.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...