Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://wearemany.com/


I'm not convinced much will come out with the

report. And it saddens me to think how long it will take if any criminal actions against Blair. Although it has past the consequences are very much today, people

living now whose lives will never be the same,

it does not feel like history to them.


Edited link to film, sorry forgot to mention

Blair's initial statement



"The report should lay to rest allegations of bad faith, lies or deceit. Whether people agree or disagree with my decision to take military action against Saddam Hussein; I took it in good faith and in what I believed to be the best interests of the country.


I note that the report finds clearly:


? That there was no falsification or improper use of Intelligence (para 876 vol 4)

? No deception of Cabinet (para 953 vol 5)

? No secret commitment to war whether at Crawford Texas in April 2002 or elsewhere (para 572 onwards vol 1)



The inquiry does not make a finding on the legal basis for military action but finds that the Attorney General had concluded there was such a lawful basis by 13th March 2003 (para 933 vol 5)


However the report does make real and material criticisms of preparation, planning, process and of the relationship with the United States.


These are serious criticisms and they require serious answers.


I will respond in detail to them later this afternoon.


I will take full responsibility for any mistakes without exception or excuse.


I will at the same time say why, nonetheless, I believe that it was better to remove Saddam Hussein and why I do not believe this is the cause of the terrorism we see today whether in the Middle East or elsewhere in the world.


Above all I will pay tribute to our Armed Forces. I will express my profound regret at the loss of life and the grief it has caused the families, and I will set out the lessons I believe future leaders can learn from my experience.?

http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/uk_577cd697e4b0c9460801b6ea?edition=uk


Protest outside conference centre today after findings.

I don't know if enquiry looked into blairs finances and deals done whilst at war with Iraq.

I would imagine it would have to be looked at,

and if not it should have, anyone know.

"The inquiry does not make a finding on the legal basis for military action but finds that the Attorney General had concluded there was such a lawful basis by 13th March 2003 (para 933 vol 5)"


Advice that the AG (Blair's own appointment) offered after changing from his original advice (twice) that a second UN resolution was required, advice that was contradicted by all 23 lawyers employed in the Foreign Office. So your mate changed his advice after pressure from you and against all FO advice and you're calling that a justification? This really is bringing back bad memories of the duplicitous little shit in whom many (including me) once invested such hope.

I have no love of T Blair - never voted for him, never trusted him, never really rated him other than as a pure politician, and that's not a quality I admire, to say the least. But almost everything that has been said about him since the Iraq war is complete nonsense. Everybody will take exactly what they want from this report and ignore/dismiss the rest. what a waste of time and money.

Funny story about the wife of a certain PM - she went to a very specialist silk emporium in Suzhou that closed the shop so she & her companions could shop for rare silks. She loaded up a trolley with a lot of beautiful silks & marched to the checkout not expecting to pay. The owner had to be called but he politely requested either cash or credit card. Feet were stamped but no hope - she paid the bill. That day the UK lost a lot of face with Chinese people as this story was shared all over.


These people are just in it for the money & don't care about little people. They have gotten away with the loot & will brazen it out.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no love of T Blair - never voted for him,

> never trusted him, never really rated him other

> than as a pure politician, and that's not a

> quality I admire, to say the least. But almost

> everything that has been said about him since the

> Iraq war is complete nonsense. Everybody will take

> exactly what they want from this report and

> ignore/dismiss the rest. what a waste of time and

> money.


Different readings are inevitable - Tony Blair himself thinks the report has vindicated him.

I disagree it was a waste of time and money. Now we know what was known, what was communicated and how the campaign was planned and run, it's there for posterity.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no love of T Blair - never voted for him,

> never trusted him, never really rated him other

> than as a pure politician, and that's not a

> quality I admire, to say the least. But almost

> everything that has been said about him since the

> Iraq war is complete nonsense. Everybody will take

> exactly what they want from this report and

> ignore/dismiss the rest. what a waste of time and

> money.



I more or less agree with you about Blair. But I don't think the report was a waste, the families responses seem to suggest that they're happy with it.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has his face shrunk or did they just choose a

> specially piteous-looking one for the front

> pages?

>

> God, I'm getting old.


I think so - he looked pretty knackered n TV just now. ...but some of these guys fake this by staying awake on purpose & put a little shake in their voice just like an actor might do - Tony boy is skilled at method acting, believe nothing he says & only a little of what you see.

Springs to Mind..


You're the one we voted for, so you must take the blame

For handing out authority to men who were insane

You say its all fixed up now, you've got new guys on the line

But you had better remember this while you still got the time

Mothers still are weeping for their boys that went to war

Father still are asking what the whole damn thing was for

And People still are hungry and people still are poor

And on this week of work these days don't feed the kids no more


Arlo Gutherie - Presidential Rag


http://www.lyricsfreak.com/a/arlo+guthrie/presidential+rag_20295552.html

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Springs to Mind..

>

> You're the one we voted for, so you must take the

> blame

> For handing out authority to men who were insane

> You say its all fixed up now, you've got new guys

> on the line

> But you had better remember this while you still

> got the time

> Mothers still are weeping for their boys that

> went to war

> Father still are asking what the whole damn thing

> was for

> And People still are hungry and people still are

> poor

> And on this week of work these days don't feed

> the kids no more

>

> Arlo Gutherie - Presidential Rag

>

> http://www.lyricsfreak.com/a/arlo+guthrie/presiden

> tial+rag_20295552.html



Oh here we go, the dripping tap/font of knowledge is back

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/information-hub/assistance-dogs-emotional-support-dogs-and-therapy-dogs/   hello   i’d be interested to understand if anyone.has experience of Assistance Dogs especially for autistic children of different ages for emotional support and therapy   There was a prior thread on this topic on EDF 10 hrs ago but it had limited experiences and there was a (claimed) change in UK legislation in 2019. Whilst the industry appears unregulated/unlicensed, there are several providers (approx 15, perhaps more) who claim to have fully trained dogs or say that they can help families to train a puppy/young dog over the 18-24 months.  The latter obviously comes with a need for strong commitment to the challenge. Costs for a fully trained assistance dog are quoted at £13-15k albeit they claim £23k total cost to train the dog. On the one hand, this could potentially be a useful solution for some families if such a dog was truly trained as their websites claim and such a dog was accepted in public places and schools etc… On the other hand, I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an assistance dog of this type or in this context (only for a blind or partially sighted person) and hence a real risk of fraud or exploitation! The SEN challenge for families coupled with limited resources in schools or from local authorities or the NHS as well as the extremely challenging experience of many families with schools offering little or no support or making the situation worse leaves a big risk of lots of different types of fraud and or exploitation in this area.          
    • Hi there  We live on Woodwarde Road backing on to Alleyns Top Field.  Our cat Gigi has gone missing — it’s been about 24 hours now. She is a cream Bengal. Could you please check sheds, garages, or anywhere she might have got stuck please? And if you could keep an eye out or share on any local groups/forums, we’d really appreciate it. Photo attached.   Thanks so much! My name is Jeff on 07956 910068. 
    • Colin.    One for the old school.   Just saying.
    • Signed, and I will share it elsewhere, thank you for posting this. It's got nearly 70,000 signatures at present, and apparently runs till February.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...