Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Yeah I thi k your first answer feels right, it's a bit close to a literal clue though isn't it, double meaning of sh?t being the only crypticity about it.


Ta anyway.


This one feels easy but nowt springing to mind


Goody-goody found in the city area? A big myth (4)


_ _ _ C

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This one feels easy but nowt springing to mind

>

> Goody-goody found in the city area? A big myth

> (4)

>

> _ _ _ C


alec, bloc, chic, croc, disc, emic, epic, etic, exec, fisc, flic, floc, huic, laic, marc, merc, narc, odic, otic, pyic, spec, sync, talc, torc, uric, zinc, zoic.

Speaking of Private Eye, did any other subscriber receive (or not) No. 1249, the one before the current one, that should have been delivered about 11 November? Mines not arrived yet.


I actually won the PE crossword prize a century or so ago. I wonder what the odds are.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
    • Still on the look out for CDs and vinyl.. around all weekend 
    • I suggest phoning before you go. I'm going to. It seems to be  only a small place and closed every morning, plus if it's only  one person they might  have to close the shop unexpectedly at other times.
    • delayed response. thanks to both of you for those suggestions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...