Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry but this is going to be a rant. ive just watched itv news and they reported that it has just been told that after the shooting of the cab driver, there were 3 unarmed police officers present. the report insinuated that the officers should have done something direct to stop the shootings. the reporter even went so far as to ask a victim what they thought about it.


are we really suggesting that unarmed police officers would have been able to make a difference direct. the death count would have been 15 not 12. those officers would have had orders not to tackle the male direct but to get on the radio and tell others what he was doing and where he was going.


the report has suggested that the officers were negligent. i'm furious does a warrant card make officers bullet proof!!!!!

it doesnt help the victims to become a victim ffs

i work weird shifts so dont have regular viewing. i dont remember the last time i watched it. did you all see the coverage of the fox attacks. they started filming a random fox that was in the street and commented on whether that was the suspect. ITS A BLOODY FOX!!!!! sympathies to the family of the girls attacked of course but its a fox

Most TV news has decended in to tabloid nonsense in the last year or 2. I used to have a lot of time for Channel 4 news at 7pm, but they have reported a few things in a really poor tabloid manner recently, it makes me really angry.


It's the same on the radio now, Radio 4 was asking the same questions about the actions of these police officers. I guess they'd all claim that they're asking the questions "the public want to hear". Maybe they're right, as there are a lot of feching thick people living in this country quite frankly.

I still watch channel 4, and listen to radio 4, and I hear the facts. As soon as they start asking people for their opinions, I tend to turn off.


Don't get me wrong, if they get a financial expert in to talk about the banking system, I'll listen, but when they get Joe Bloggs in to say what he reckons about that thing that happened, I just can't be arsed. The coverage of the whole Isreal thing has been pretty shite too IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...