Jump to content

Recommended Posts

aerie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Worth the wait? (9 years) would you sit through it

> again? will there be yet another sequel? is he

> indestructible ?


Really disappointing compared to the others. I even thought the fourth was better than this one.


Unforgivably it was boring.


Only redeeming features- Vincent Cassel as the asset and Alicia Vikander (to look at).

I'm not a Bourne fan - saw the first and the second I think and then neither of the following until this one. Hope that these aren't seen as spoilers, but I really enjoyed it in a mindless, jerky cam, perpetual fight and car chase scene kind of way. I thought the car chases in particular were great and the Asset went from full on creepy villain to someone who I ended up feeling a bit sorry for (not much, just a bit). Wasn't such a fan of Alicia Vikander's "cyber ops" role - thought she was underused and a waste of a good actress and the tech bits were risible (but fun in a suspend your disbelief kind of way).


Maybe it is more enjoyable as a standalone if you're not a massive fan of the series of films?

Nowhere near as good as the others. The lack of mystery around his identity changes things. There were also too many situations where an unbelievable risk was taken (e.g. taking way too long to leave a room), and it was clearly just used as a mechanism to set up a car chase or a crazy, last-minute escape.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a few years ago now, but I organised my end of year prom (for year 13) at Off the Cuff in Herne Hill - was on the cheaper side to rent and at that age, felt very cool and clubby. I had my own 18th at Whirled Cinema in Loughborough Junction but I'm not sure if they take event bookings like that anymore 
    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...