Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone see the big group of people riding quad bikes and scooters? They just went down Lordship Lane doing wheelies, speeding, etc.


Surely it's illegal to drive like that? because it's the 3rd or 4th time I've seen them and I'm surprised the police haven't somehow stopped them. It's at best anti social and at worst very dangerous.

Seen them a few times- On Church Road in Crystal Palace, the narrow end by the shops, a group of about 60 scooters and quad bikes, weaving in and out of other traffic, doing wheelies, riding on the pavement- people had to duck into side streets, front gardens etc. Following them were two police bikes but not chasing them or getting them to stop, more keeping an eye on them.


I think scooter gangs are quite a big thing now in this part of London.

The scooters must have licence plates so the cops could track them down if they've got the registration. I don't think the cops can chase them because it is dangerous for the scooter maniacs and passers by and anyway, cops in cars cannot nip onto estates and into parks etc. If they track them down they should confiscate the scooters imo

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Following them were two police bikes but not chasing them or getting

> them to stop, more keeping an eye on them.


Were they wearing helmets? I'd guess not. Police are not allowed to chase people on motorbikes if they aren't wearing helmets. So they don't.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-32904622


Nuts. Just nuts.

Wonder if this is related to the guys on dirt bikes, who were tearing around the area around this time last year?


It was discussed on this very forum... apparently they're good kids really, it is society's fault for not providing a local off-road bike course for them.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Following them were two police bikes but not

> chasing them or getting

> > them to stop, more keeping an eye on them.

>

> Were they wearing helmets? I'd guess not. Police

> are not allowed to chase people on motorbikes if

> they aren't wearing helmets. So they don't.

>

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-329046

> 22

>

> Nuts. Just nuts.


Indeed a lot of them weren't. If memory serves it was more hoods and face scarves. My memory is notoriously bad though.

It's happened a number of times and there have been various threads on it, including this one: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1666994,1666994#msg-1666994


The point I made before (and which I'll make again) is that the ability to act with impunity and to stick your fingers up to the police is dangerous in and of itself. The gathering at Tower Bridge, was so similar to the prelude for the London Riots in terms of atmosphere it was scary. I saw this article the other day also:


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/05/conditions-that-caused-english-riots-even-worse-now-says-leading-expert?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


The police need to get a grip on it.


The scooters must have licence plates so the cops could track them down if they've got the registration



A lot of them don't, or have tiny plates (so as not to be legible from a distance / ANPR camera / passing police car). And if they're not wearing helmets, hard for the cops to pull them over.


Unfortunately they've learned from the 2011 riots (where so many of the perps were ID'ed after the fact thanks to CCTV) & now all wear masks or scarves.

There's a documentary on the BBC iPlayer at the moment, Britain's Most Wanted Motorcycle Gand?


Most of the footage and interviews are from the Thamesmead estate. The guys involved seem to think that being part of 'Bike Life' is a healthy outlet for their energies and stress. Better than alternative lifestyles in the estate, like violence and organised crime.


Questions like, "Do you have a driving licence?" were sadly unasked.

This is beyond ridiculous, they put pedestrians and drivers in danger and obviously don't care about their own lives. Strict measures should be taken instead of pointing at excuses like they were not wearing helmets, which is another violation in itself...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...