Jump to content

Recommended Posts

............so, any thoughts on tonight's outcome?


I really want to believe we are going to go out there and cream them, but can't rid this nagging doubt in my head that has happened a million times before that we will leave ourselves needing to win 3 or 4 nil to go through 2nd in our group, or even worse not make it through at all!!


I just don't get it, on paper we have a very decent team, why oh why do we never look like we are going to walk it!!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11837-england-v-algeria/
Share on other sites

Did I jinx it?

OR am I just getting used to the same old same old from a team that has no incentive whatsoever to do well.


Sure a few of the players want to do well for themselves and their country, unfortunately capello sat with his thumb up his arse all night and left them on the bench!!!


So any guesses on how LUCKY we will be on Wednesday? USA draw and we get a cheeky goal or purely on lots??


What a depressing start to the weekend!

Another carefully controlled, and measured performance by our lads, they are keeping the best till last, obviously.


Is Heskey a little overweight and slightly slower than one might expect,


for one of the very best eleven players we have?


We shall have to put it down to er altitude!

There is one man I would happily shoot in this world cup, the one who makes those awful crappy noisey horns.


At any ground in the UK you can hear the gasps of tension in a game, which all helps to make you feel included,


and I really miss it,


these brainless cretinous horn-blowing morons are ruining a vital part of our game.


It's not the same watching with the sound off either, bar studs!



Algeria seemed fitter and faster than our lot, but that was equalled out by not being as effective as our top team,


perhaps. Nil, nil draw does not suggest either team was that effective though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...