Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday at 3:15 in the afternoon, I was walking down Lordship Lane with my mum, my pregnant sister and carrying my daughter in my arms. We had just had lunch at GBK and were walking home down lordship lane. We got to corner of Whateley road when two guys on a motor bike dressed in black and wearing helmets stopped, the one at the back got off, ran up to my mum and pulled the gold necklace she was wearing off her.

In reflex my mum fought back and while I was trying to stop her, she was pushed to the ground. They then sped off and we were left shouting for help.

A big thank you to everyone who came to help, called the police and also tried to chase and to Bells who are sharing cctv footage.


Please watch out for unmarked motorcycle bikes in the area, according to the police, there have been a number of instances of phone snatching (not many of jewellery) in the area recently. This incident was in broad daylight, right next to where the police station used to be (now a school).

I'm generally regarded as a limp wristed wooly liberal on criminal matters, but this policy (and it's a policy, not a law) drives me mad. If I snatch a handbag and run off along a busy road, will plod not pursue me in case I run into the traffic? If someone's committed a crime they have to accept the risks of pursuit. Surely the police and lawmakers could agree on a formula absolving the police of responsibility for any injuries occurring from a rider removing their helmet during a pursuit? They still chase car thieves who don't wear seatbelts, don't they? Grrr...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...