Jump to content

Recommended Posts

candycat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> daizie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Blimey , any sighting of a chav, an England

> flag

> > or a dangerous dog ?

>

>

> I actually find that comment quite offensive. I

> live in council accomodation but am not a chav, do

> not own a dangerous dog & am not flying the

> england flag. You imply that every council tenant

> is the lowest of the low, but I can assure you,

> that is not the case. Maybe you should not be so

> narrow minded!


Oh thats a shame i want you all to be the same cant you try ?

CandyCat

Far be it from my tepid nature to get involved in any sort heated debate, but I couldn't help but notice that at no point in any of Dazie's posts did she imply council tenants are the 'lowest of the low'. Please could you confirm in which post this was implied as I seem to have missed it, having read through them all several times ?

santerme

You obviously have nothing better to do, this is supposed to be a forum for sensible discussion for sensible up standing people ! Yet all you seem to do is pick on peoples technical errors in the messages. It is that sort of attitude that i believe is indicative of the moral decline of this nation....

Kidneypunch! Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

It is that sort of attitude that i

> believe is indicative of the moral decline of this

> nation....


Kidney Punch, you said 'indic' which is so like nearly almost the same as like, IN DICK it couldn't be more similar if it tried..

You're so morally declined, dude it's just not true.

Seriously, man I'd decline anything you offered if you was my waitress. Trus' me geez.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes! What was so funny, my mum wiped my bum on a

> sheet while my dad sat on the couch effing and

> cursing in disgust, i remember it well (tu)


---------------------------------------------------------


::o Please tell me that this didn't take place last week..

Kidneypunch! Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> santerme

> You obviously have nothing better to do, this is

> supposed to be a forum for sensible discussion for

> sensible up standing people ! Yet all you seem to

> do is pick on peoples technical errors in the

> messages. It is that sort of attitude that i

> believe is indicative of the moral decline of this

> nation....


...?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...