Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At least the return game is now a straightforward matter. Arsenal "simply" have to go out to win :)). Had they won the home leg 2-1 (which would probably have been a "fairer" outcome) then there'd have been all manner of complicated permutations to consider next week. Liverpool must be pretty pleased but the tie is clearly still very much a live one! :))
Torres? Torres who? Was he playing last night? Oh yes, thats was the blond bloke chucking himslef about a lot to try and con the ref. Cheating b**tard. Liverpool are a one man, one dimensional team and that was clear for all to see last night, ref had a mare, stonewall pen. Pool out singing our fans? I was there and that is nowhere near accurate. A few arguments/fights broke out in and around Holloway Road. My son has a row with four scousers who pushed into his back on purpose to force their way through the crowd and laughed at him when he complained, they didn't laugh when he squared up to them backed up by a mate of mine. Scousers celebrating like they'd won the world cup. Just shows you they know how unbelievably lucky they were. Can't wait to go to their place!!!!
So, not too pleased about the result then? Lets be clear, it should have been a penalty, fair enough, but dens the brakes, every team except Man U have missed out on good shouts. I think it's unfair to call Torres a cheat, he's a real hard worker who picks himself up and dusts himself down.

Actually Atila, I'll think you'll find that Mr Torres was a rather fetching shade of ginger last night. I imagine that the highlights had gone a bit wrong. Maybe your eyes were deceiving you? ;-)


Cheat is not a word I would put in the same sentance as Nando. But hey like you - I'm biased.:)

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I reckon we'll be discussing Senor Torres quite a

> bit in the coming years, although I reckon we

> won't be knocking him for diving. What an amazing

> start to his first Premiership season. He's been

> hacked to bits, but just gets up and keeps on

> running.


I was keeping my I on the Senor last night and I have to say, I thought he was diving as much as any other Premiership forward. Not so squeaky clean after all.

How odd, I thought I watched a largely good tempered game last night with no more gamesmanship than you'd normally expect to see (ie too much, but that's the sad spectacle that is top level footie these days; give me a comedy Hamlets game and cheap beer any day of the week).

Torres was largely marked out the game, which of course opened up space a few times for the kuyt and gerrard to exploit.

It was an interesting game without being particularly exciting for a neutral. In fact I think I may have done a sudoku in the last 15 minutes.


As for diving, had Hleb not gone down like heifer in a slaughterhouse he might have actually been awarded the penalty. Ref had a very very good view of the incident!


Most encouraging thing for me was Walcott, he may yet become the player we hoped he might!


It must be tiring being quite so angry the whole time ;-)

*ahem* that was more aimed at Atila, I was rather surprised by the levels of indignation and invective for ultimately a comparatively tame and incident free game.

I guess when the stakes are high...


And yes, as I said last night it was a definite penalty, but the replay shows just how easily he went down and the ref must have had his reasons as there was no clearer viewpoint than his.

Hleb was hauled to the ground, what was he supposed to do? Go down in a specific way to gain approval of the ref? Ref had a good view of the incident you say, so why didn't he give it then? Give me f**king strength. I can see now why Liverpool are miles off the top 3 in the league!

"Ref had a good view of the incident you say, so why didn't he give it then?"


Strangely you've answered your own question.

It's a subjective thing, but i watched the replay several times and I guarantee you that had I been in a normal environment and Kuyt had done the same thing to me I wouldn't lying prone, I'd be looking at him not a little nonplussed....on two feet.


Quite Keef quite. cool/book T9 syndrome?

Agree about Walcott, he was running Liverpool ragged, and caused my heart the most problems. Also agree that it was a clear penalty, but as Piers says, had he not made quite so much of it, the ref may well have given it. As for Torres Atila, if he's a cheat in your book then fine, but pot and kettle mate, every team, yours included has players who will take a tumble. Lets look on the bright side, we're set up for a good match next week with both teams still very much in it!
Oh and as for Liverpool and the top 3 (I can't believe I'm rising to this playground nonsense), we're actually not too far off you now if you look at the table. Oh, and you were 4th last year, so what are you on about? It is a bloody game man, we all like it, and we all support our teams, but come on!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh and as for Liverpool and the top 3 (I can't

> believe I'm rising to this playground nonsense),

> we're actually not too far off you now if you look

> at the table. Oh, and you were 4th last year, so

> what are you on about? It is a bloody game man, we

> all like it, and we all support our teams, but

> come on!


Not too far off us? In terms of style and content you are lights years behind us and we have spent a fraction of the money Liverpool have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...