Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"There's no point putting a first choice you are far off target for. And only apply for ones you really want to go to. You don't have to use all your choices available on the form."


Jools: sorry, this is terrible, terrible advice.


It is really important that anyone starting out on schools admission studies the schools Admission Code and understands it. there are many myths flying around, like this advice from Jools. The Schools Admissions Code is law and it applies to all LAs in England.


1. Your list is a list of 'preferences'. They don't HAVE to give you a school on your list. You will only be offered a place where you fulfil the entry criteria.

2. List all your schools in your genuine order of preference. Every school will assess your application against their published entry criteria, and will tell the LA whether or not they can offer you a place. They do not prioritise applicants who have put them first, the schools do not know where on the list the applicant has placed them.

3. the LA looks at all the offers that the schools on your list has made, and pass on to you the offer from the school that is highest on your list of preferences. if you do not get a place in your highest school, you automatically get put on the waiting list for all schools higher up the list that the one you have been offered.

4. if none of the schools you have applied to can offer you a place you will be offered a place at any school, which has space after all the other allocations have been made. That is why it is important to continue listing preferences until you have one that you are certain you will get - because of a sibling rule or you live right on the doorstep, for example, even if you don't rate it much. Because if you don't list that, you might get offered something even less attractive, and further away.

I agree totally with what Carbonara says. I would like to add, it is OK to put a long shot 1st/2nd on your list and it won't reduce your chance to get the highly likely schools you put lower down. It's not a good idea however to put down 6 schools that are all long shots! Look at the last place distances from schools to see where you would have gained a place in 2016 to give you a rough idea of where your child may be offered a place. Remember that these figures are from offer day and do not include waiting list movement.

Renata

Any statisticians out there? If 150 kids are split into 9 bands according to "the national distribution of ability", how many are in each of the bands?


While it's probably not our first choice, as Harris Girls only give 1/3 of each band to kids from within 1km, I'm starting to wonder if even that is a reliable option for us.

TBH I think it is hard to be strategic and game the system. The admissions criteria can feel baffline - lotteries, fair banding, proximity etc etc. I've got 2 who've recently gone through this and I would definitely agree with the advice offered. Go and see several schools. It's quite likely you'll be very pleasantly reassured - local secondary schools are really good. Try and compile a list of ones you like and your daughter likes. There'll be different reasons for each - some very close that you can get to easily and quickly, some with fabulous music provision (like Kingsdale), some single sex / mixed. It's worth visiting some of the less popular ones too, I think. Reading the forum, you often hear enthusiastic reports from parents visiting the less "popular" schools. Go for any of the tests and scholarship days (the Kingsdale sports one is very good fun and if you get the music one at any level it just gives your child access to the provision once they're there.)


List them in genuine order of preference knowing that you will remain on the waiting lists for the ones higher up the list to any choice you get lower down.


Good luck!

tasha1 - Habs have 2 primaries in their "federation". 1 is a mile or so away in New Cross, and kids get into the secondary automatically, which uses up to 60 places. The second one is on site, but only has kids up to year 3 at the moment (as it only opened 3 years ago) so they won't start in secondary for a few years.

Hi Nunheadmum, if you are talking about Haberdasher's Askes, they have got rid of the banding for this year and also there is no sibling link for 6th formers. It will be straight as the crow flies distance to the site closest to you. As there are 8 forms in each of years 12 and 13 removal of the sibling link for these years will have some impact. In the Nunhead area, in previous years some girls have got into Aske's, others have gone to Deptford Green, some to Harris Girls, some to Sydenham Girls the odd one to Prendergast; so a mix! I would expect from Nunhead that you would be highly likely to get a place in Harris Girl's. From previous last place distances you would get into Deptford Green and might get into Haberdashers (dependant on your location). In terms of Charter East Dulwich it's hard to judge what will happen as it's its first year on the CAF form and also I don't know where in Nunhead you are.

Renata

Hi Renata. No, I know that Haberdashers has dropped the banding. It's Harris Girls that I'm talking about. They say that they give 1/3 of places remaining in each band (of which there are 9), after looked after/SEN/siblings, will be available for girls who live within 1km. If you have a child who is towards either end of the 'normal' distribution (i.e. quite bright or not so able), that's a third of not a lot of available spaces when you look at the spread on a normal distribution curve.


I know all the secondaries that are a 'possible' for us (we're south Nunhead, off Ivydale Road) and all the ins and outs of the process. But all of them are just that - a possible. There isn't one school that I can say is our dead cert safe option. I thought Harris was going to be it but when I look at the detail of their admissions policy, it isn't 100%. I was hoping that someone better at stats than me could advise on the numbers and reassure me that my calculation of the odds was out.


We should get in somewhere but - especially as Lewisham schools have dropped banding and that may have been how the odd couple got into Habs or Sydenham - we just don't know where that may be. Deptford Green has been reliable in past years but it's getting a better name and I'm sure that means shrinking catchment.


It's just unsettling for the kids.

I think ED Harris do fair banding which means that its not based on a normal distribution curve but rather on the distribution relative to the applicant pool. Anyhow, the remaining 2/3rds of places are a lottery within a wider catchment area (I think 2 miles). The 1/3rd within a 1km is just to ensure that a decent portion of the student body comes from the areas immediately surround the school. I wouldn't worry about how the banding is likely to impact your odds as its impossible to assess given its based on fair banding.

teecee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to let you all know I had a nightmare with my

> choices on March 1st this year I only put 3

> choices on my Southwark list and than Charter ED

> as it was a separate application. I didn't get New

> Charter and gave up as I was 139 on the waiting

> list and than got none of my 3 choices, Southwark

> gave me Harris Peckham academy on Peckham High

> street, it was a very stressful time. I would

> advise everyone to go to all the open days and

> really think about what you put down cause if you

> just fill up the list to make the 6 choices you

> could get the one that you really didn't want.

> Many of my sons school friends did get one of

> their 3 choices but everyone can't so there is

> about a 10% chance you won't get anything you

> wanted. Luckily it all worked out OK for us,

> because a lot of parents who got New Charter and

> one of their choices on Southwark application

> declined New Charter maybe because of the

> temporary site and having to get the mini buses to

> Camberwell. So we got offered a place about 2

> months after offer day. My son started last Monday

> and loves it, the mini bus service is fantastic,

> the teachers and heads are great,and when it does

> move to its permanent site at Dulwich hospital it

> will be another great school to have in ED. Also

> just to let you know the catchment is quite small,

> the pupils are all from Dog kennel hill, Goose

> green, St John & st Clements, Bessener grange and

> Goodrich.


That's not quite true. Some from Ivydale that I know of at least with many offers made on the east side of Peckham Rye Common for all the reasons people have already noted. Will be different this year of course.


HP

  • 5 months later...

Hi there just wondered if anyone might be able answer a few queries re: charter 2 catchment. Our son is at Lyndhurst school just over from dog kennel hill school. A few -though i'm not sure how many- pupils were offered charter 2 places. Is this likely because they live nearer the dog kennel hill/goosegreen side? I'm really keen for our son to go to this school and he'll be entering yr 7 the same year as it's move to the new location. How likely are we to get in living at an address near denmark hill, on one of the roads behind kings college hospital? Our Son also spends a substantial amount of time at his grandparents as they act as (near)full time childminders whilst I work - they are in dulwich very near goodrich (where I personally went as a child) which I note also accepted pupils to charter 2. As a young parent myself I still count my parent's address as my family home despite renting in camberwell. Most of my post is sent to my parents address except utility linked to my camberwell one, and my son spends 4 afterschool evenings with weekend care there. I want to know if using my parent's address 1) improves our chances and 2) is technically allowed regarding habitation rules. I wanted to include road locations but didn't know clever that was, happy to if it helps /people think it is ok to.


Thanks!

I saw on another thread that Habs furthest distance this year was 660m. This is the first year of no banding so that's helpful to know. But do we know if that furthest offer was purely a distance based offer or was it SEN / sibling / child at their feeder primary?

eve_max - you can only apply from one address, the address that is your child's permanent residence. This is generally defined as the address that you pay council tax for and / or the address that the child's Child Benefit goes to. It is definitely your address and not your parents' address. Childcare is not taken into account as a deciding factor on distance for admissions. The LA do many spot checks to ascertain that people are using their correct address.


Also,unless your school is a feeder school, the admissions distance is done from your home address and the school your child attends is irrelevant.


You may find that you are as close to some Lambeth schools as Southwark - it doesn't matter what borough schools are in, you can apply to all with an equal chance of getting a place, dependent on their admissions criteria. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me can help with the questions of distance to Charter.

Sorry for confusion, no I mean the new habs primary I think frm memory it is called temple grove? It opereated from its permanent site for the first time in 2016. When I went to view it in 2016, I recall the head saying that although the original primary at hatcham was a feeder, the new primary was not. Can I have got that completely wrong?

Midivydale,


The new habs school has always intended to become a feeder but they weren't one when you were there last year, so you're not wrong! They were going through the process of setting up feeder status a couple of months ago but not quite sure if it's been finalised yet.


The oldest kids there are currently in year 3 so it will be a few years before that matters and given that the "catchment" for the primary is probably even less than for the secondary most of those kids would probably have got into the secondary anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...