Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now I'd like to state at the beginning that I am essentially a pacifist and feel that differences are best resolved through debate rather than physical violence wherever possible.


But in the recent weeks there has been a growing urge within me, and I am unsure how to deal with it.


I spend some of my time in one of the wealthiest parts of London, where it is not uncommon to see expensive cars parked up on the street. Usually with a driver in them, presumably waiting for the car's owner to complete whatever self-important business he is engaged in.


When I say expensive, I don't mean Audis or BMWs. I mean Bentleys and Rolls Royces and vehicles which I'm unfamiliar with but which it's obvious cost a lot of money. There is no way of disputing the fact that these cars are simply egotistical status symbols. That is their primary function.


So, here we are, waiting for the government's ruthless spending cuts to kick in. Millions of people will find themselves unemployed, and many others, mainly at the lower end of the wealth scale will find their incomes reduced. There will be hardship. And yet these rich maniacs with their expensive cars still see fit to display their ill-gotten gains on the street. Rubbing some extra salt in the wound.


As a result of this I feel a compulsion to take my keys from my pocket and calmly drag them along the side of one of these vehicles. An impotent act perhaps, but these people need to know that we hate them.


This has left me in something of a quandary. My morals are all in a whirl. I can't decide what is wrong or right.


What do you think? If I do it will I be possessed by a terrible guilt? Will I have lowered myself to the level of the petty vandal?

Is it that you are genuinely saddened by people that have been successful in life enjoying nice things?


Is it that you were wronged in some way buy a wealthy person?


Or is that you are just jealous that some people have things you presumably cannot have yourself?


Having nice expensive things does not necessarily make these people better off than you!

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it that you are genuinely saddened by people

> that have been successful in life enjoying nice

> things?

>


I am genuinely saddened that they feel the need to display their wealth and privilege so ostentatiously. I would use the adjective "lucky" rather than "successful". What is your definition of success - increasing the wealth gap between yourself and others?



> Is it that you were wronged in some way buy a

> wealthy person?

>


Wealthy people who use their wealth to generate more wealth for themselves with no regard for the conditions of others are constantly wronging a large proportion of the population.


Also, the environmental impact of their cars and lifestyle wrongs many people.



> Or is that you are just jealous that some people

> have things you presumably cannot have yourself?


Not especially jealous as I am lucky enough to be in a fairly comfortable financial situation. In addition I would never want a status symbol of this kind - it would indicate that I had lost my mind.


>

> Having nice expensive things does not necessarily

> make these people better off than you!


What do you mean?

Jesus, can't be arsed replying to all of that.


On the basis that you are being serious, why shouldn't people who can afford nice things buy them, what you expect someone who can afford a bentley to buy a nissan micra as not to offend others?


If you are comfortable then would you be fine with someone poorer than you scratching your car as its better than theirs?


What I mean is just because they have wealth, they may not indeed be happy in life.


On the basis you're on a wind up then.......................b0ll0x :-)

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > jrussel Wrote:

> >

> > Will I have lowered myself to the level of the

> > petty vandal?

> >

> > With any act of mindless vandalism. Yes. Of

> > course.

>

> Is it mindless, though?


Premeditated perhaps but then vandalism is what it is and it's a pretty mindless and stupid thing to do. Would you like it if someone did the same or something similar to you? I think not.

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jesus, can't be arsed replying tall of that.

>


"Can't be arsed"? I'll take a guess about what that really means.



> On the basis that you are being serious, why

> shouldn't people who can afford nice things buy

> them, what you expect someone who can afford a

> bentley to buy a nissan micra as not to offend

> others?

>


By displaying their wealth in such an ostentatious way they are showing a disregard for the feelings of those less fortunate than them.


Buying nice things you can afford is one thing.


Buying things primarily to display your massive wealth is distasteful. I'd say it's not indicative of a very nice person.



> If you are comfortable then would you be fine with

> someone poorer than you scratching your car as its

> better than theirs?


I don't have a car.


But say for example someone mugged me for my smartphone. How I would feel about this would be affected according to the wealth gap between us, and the reasons for its existence.


>

> What I mean is just because they have wealth, they

> may not indeed be happy in life.

>


This is true; however, you cannot deny a general relationship between wealth and happiness especially at the lower end of the scale. If you cannot afford decent food and shelter then this is very likely to impact on your happiness. If you have access to wealth you may well be able to access better healthcare resulting in higher levels of wellbeing.


> On the basis you're on a wind up

> then.......................b0ll0x :-)

And yet these rich maniacs with their expensive cars still see fit to display their ill-gotten gains on the street.

these people need to know that we hate them.


writes jrussell.



I do not think for one minute that they are maniacs just because they are rich.


How do you know they are ill-gotten gains, many people work hard, save, and buy what they want.


Some years ago I went through a high earning phase whilst working seven days a week and could have bought a good S/H one but did not care for the damn great things and I don't think people like them too much as they suggest troughs and snouts.


I would not have appreciated anyone keying any car I have owned, least of all a collectors item Roller/Bentley.


I do not hate people because they are rich, in fact I rather envy them their wealth and good fortune.


I hate people who behave like inconsiderate selfish sh!ts, who wantonly damage or break stuff deliberately because it does not belong to them.


jrussell's attitude will no doubt change as he eventually becomes richer and acquires more possessions, I can only hope he is spotted by another up'ncoming jrussell who keys his car.


It is all well and good having anger jrussell,

but you have to harness that anger as a positive force for your benefit, not a destructive and wilful act of violence.


Could be, one of these days in the not too distant future, that the flash car is yours.

By displaying their wealth in such an ostentatious way they are showing a disregard for the feelings of those less fortunate than them.


Ok, I'm feeding the troll here, but it's Friday...


Do you mean like using drinking water for flushing your toilet, whilst a lot of the world goes thirsty?


Or by throwing away a large percentage of perfectly good food whilst a lot of the world goes hungry?


Relatively, this whole country is, in world terms, that ostentatious person you hate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...